users@jms-spec.java.net: by author

Abhishek Gupta
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sun Apr 26 23:46:35 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sat Apr 25 00:25:01 2015)
Adam Bien
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Thu Jul 7 06:26:35 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Thu Jul 7 02:44:52 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Thu Jun 30 03:05:34 2011)
Andrew Kennedy
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Feb 15 07:10:41 2012)
Anghel Leonard
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Mon Jan 4 21:52:33 2016)
Antoine Sabot-Durand
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Mon Oct 5 07:11:14 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Tue Oct 20 07:46:48 2015)
arjan tijms
- [jms-spec users] Re: java.net.jms-spec has been migrated to GitHub and groups.io discussion service (Thu May 11 04:56:37 2017)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Sat Oct 8 06:01:59 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 01:47:31 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 11:39:12 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 05:45:05 2016)
Bill Shannon
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 15:25:40 2016)
Buchi Reddy Busireddy
- [jms-spec users] (Thu Jan 26 23:04:36 2012)
Chris Barrow
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Thu Oct 13 16:21:01 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 11:03:14 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 10:40:04 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Tue Dec 8 21:38:27 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 19 Oct 2015 (Fri Oct 30 14:30:47 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 19 Oct 2015 (Fri Oct 30 14:25:47 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Thu Oct 22 10:35:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Can I start work on JMS 2.1 spec changes for the ACK mode related issues? (Tue Oct 20 17:12:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 15:17:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 17:16:25 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 08:18:32 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: About JMS_SPEC-116 (Mon Jul 27 11:11:31 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-165: Error in javadoc for Connection#stop and JMSContext#stop (Thu Jan 8 09:12:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Fri Dec 26 10:04:50 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Thu Sep 19 00:00:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Individual Client ACK (Tue Sep 17 23:58:08 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Fri Feb 1 08:42:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Thu Feb 21 19:14:43 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Tue Feb 19 09:18:41 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Tue Jan 29 23:19:59 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Mon Jan 28 16:34:06 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Mon Jan 28 16:28:05 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 1: relationship to topic subscriptions) (Tue Jan 15 11:52:59 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Tue Jan 15 08:14:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Thu Dec 6 12:03:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Fri Dec 21 10:17:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Sun Nov 4 01:08:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 09:26:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] What is the expected value returned by setClientID when client identifier is unset? (Fri Jul 6 12:40:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Tue Jul 10 10:10:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Fri Jun 29 13:25:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Thu Jun 28 10:51:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: question about scope of shared non-durable and durable subscriptions (Thu Jun 28 10:14:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Wed Jun 27 22:36:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0: question about scope of shared non-durable and durable subscriptions (Wed Jun 27 15:34:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed May 30 09:45:00 2012)
Clebert
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sat Apr 25 18:21:23 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 05:21:51 2015)
Clebert Suconic
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 06:43:29 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 05:59:29 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Mon Oct 10 05:25:18 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 20:38:14 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 08:28:43 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery (Mon Oct 12 08:24:03 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery (Mon Oct 12 08:21:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Tue Oct 6 10:08:02 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Tue Oct 6 09:42:02 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Sep 8 13:12:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Wed Sep 30 10:17:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Wed Sep 30 10:14:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 14:50:40 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 14:21:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 14:02:58 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 09:54:45 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 08:30:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 08:11:58 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 06:34:42 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Mon Mar 16 12:46:43 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Mon Mar 16 06:35:38 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 10:21:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 08:16:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 07:51:39 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] common connection factory instantiation (Mon Mar 9 15:32:27 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 (JSR 368) expert group (Mon Oct 6 12:43:10 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 (JSR 368) expert group (Mon Oct 6 12:17:29 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 08:03:29 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 06:56:32 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 06:28:59 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 06:23:27 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 06:10:48 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Thu Sep 19 06:14:45 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Wed Sep 18 07:02:49 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Wed Sep 18 05:11:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Tue Sep 17 14:40:36 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Sep 19 09:34:32 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Thu Sep 19 08:17:17 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Individual Client ACK (Tue Sep 17 11:57:12 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] JMS 2.0 session creation in MDB lifecycle callback (Thu Aug 22 07:43:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: TCK Issue - com.sun.ts.tests.jms.core20.jmsproducerqueuetests.Client.msgPropertiesTest (Thu Jul 25 03:22:12 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] TCK Issue - com.sun.ts.tests.jms.core20.jmsproducerqueuetests.Client.msgPropertiesTest (Wed Jul 24 16:26:58 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 13:46:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 13:27:17 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 12:42:42 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 12:36:58 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Tue Feb 19 09:25:35 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-114) Clarify javadoc descriptions of XAQueueConnection#createSession and XATopicSession#createSession (Thu Feb 14 06:49:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Inconsistence on Javadoc regarding XAQueueConnection and XAConnection (Tue Feb 12 13:54:52 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Mon Jan 28 14:29:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Fri Jan 18 12:16:59 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 15:17:18 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 06:50:21 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Wed Jan 16 13:40:32 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Sat Jan 12 19:11:07 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Mon Jan 7 08:48:12 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Wed Oct 24 06:00:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS Topics and historical data (Mon Jul 9 12:24:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Thu May 31 06:46:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed May 30 10:38:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Batch Messages really abandoned? (Wed May 2 08:52:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed May 23 05:52:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed May 23 05:51:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 11:33:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri May 18 11:18:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 09:47:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 09:41:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 09:01:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri May 18 09:00:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 07:58:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-61) Selector on JMS body (Wed Apr 4 12:44:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Feb 20 13:21:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 17 09:06:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored (Fri Jan 13 05:58:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Dec 2 09:49:26 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Nov 25 08:50:59 2011)
Constantin DRABO
- [jms-spec users] FasoJUG join effort of "Adopt JSR #343" (Sat Jan 12 07:03:05 2013)
David Blevins
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 15:38:07 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 15:32:58 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 14:50:48 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 06:43:49 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Sat Oct 17 01:34:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Issue I18: Legacy MessageListener and _at_JMSListener compatibility (Tue Aug 4 20:54:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Jun 9 15:56:32 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Jun 30 01:00:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sun Apr 26 12:49:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sat Apr 25 17:24:53 2015)
David Heffelfinger
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Tue Nov 17 02:55:50 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Sat Oct 3 05:04:14 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne San Francisco 2015 (Sat Oct 3 04:53:52 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 02:07:40 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Sat Sep 12 03:25:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Wed Aug 12 16:30:01 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Tue Aug 11 16:56:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-116: Make Message Poisoning Handling a priority? (Tue Aug 11 16:50:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 02:36:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Fri Aug 14 02:08:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Thu Aug 13 02:47:27 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Make Message Poisoning Handling a priority? (Wed Aug 12 16:48:04 2015)
David Zhao
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Thu Aug 13 18:35:36 2015)
Dayo Egbetola
- [jms-spec users] PoolSize Configuration (Mon Nov 18 10:19:45 2013)
Dejan Bosanac
- [jms-spec users] (Tue Apr 5 08:38:49 2011)
Deniz Oğuz
- [jms-spec users] JMS Topics and historical data (Sat Jun 30 03:26:29 2012)
Ed Bratt
- [jms-spec users] java.net.jms-spec has been migrated to GitHub and groups.io discussion service (Wed May 10 17:57:24 2017)
Elias Ross
- [jms-spec users] Re: Confusion about JMSProducer methods and CDI (Mon Jun 9 11:46:21 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Confusion about JMSProducer methods and CDI (Thu Jun 5 11:29:27 2014)
Evans Armitage
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Mon Oct 10 05:49:49 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Sep 1 06:32:13 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Fri Aug 28 09:03:35 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Fri Aug 28 08:03:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Wed Aug 26 04:36:45 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Aug 25 21:44:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Mon Aug 24 09:59:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Mon Aug 24 08:29:57 2015)
George Karabotsos
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Sun Apr 26 11:52:32 2015)
Hiram Chirino
- [jms-spec users] Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination (Wed Jan 4 09:19:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination (Mon Jan 9 17:57:13 2012)
Ivar Grimstad
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JavaOne 2016 (Sat Apr 16 23:04:11 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] update to Java EE 8 plan (Mon Aug 22 22:51:54 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Fri May 6 07:21:28 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 20:41:41 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 20:23:38 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Advice: mirror on GitHub (Fri Mar 18 01:28:22 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 01:50:08 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub (Fri Mar 18 03:30:35 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 22:55:46 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 06:22:40 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 04:06:41 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Thu Nov 19 01:59:10 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 08:26:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Tue Oct 6 10:39:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Welcome new expert group member: Ivar Grimstad (Sun Sep 13 01:33:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: simplifying the annotations (Fri Sep 11 04:45:25 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Wed Sep 9 01:16:13 2015)
John Archbold
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Feb 7 13:25:43 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Tue Jan 29 14:01:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Tue Jan 29 09:50:41 2013)
John D. Ament
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Mon Oct 10 05:37:45 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Sat Oct 8 08:05:55 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Thu Apr 28 14:26:07 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Tue Nov 17 04:55:56 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Tue Oct 13 04:53:41 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 05:31:22 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 13:00:26 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 10:29:27 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 10:10:45 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition in spec? (Sun Jan 4 20:17:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition in spec? (Sun Jan 4 19:35:26 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) (Tue Nov 25 07:48:01 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 06:21:09 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Individual Client ACK (Tue Sep 17 13:52:20 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco (Mon Jul 22 07:18:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 13:47:46 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 13:37:48 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Mon Jun 24 13:02:02 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Tue Jun 25 04:05:05 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Mon May 20 07:12:57 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 07:10:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 06:41:07 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 06:40:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Mar 6 13:17:40 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Mar 6 05:27:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Fri Mar 15 16:32:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Mar 12 06:12:09 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Feb 1 09:57:30 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting (Mon Feb 25 10:19:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Wed Feb 20 07:18:43 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Tue Feb 19 08:56:57 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Collecting issues for JMS 2.next? (Mon Feb 4 16:20:06 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Mon Jan 28 16:45:17 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Mon Jan 21 13:40:38 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Mon Jan 21 05:51:29 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft is now published (Thu Jan 3 10:38:18 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Wed Jan 16 10:45:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 late change: Activation property subscriptionScope (Mon Jan 14 06:14:50 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft is now published (Thu Jan 3 10:09:44 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 late change: Activation property subscriptionScope (Fri Jan 11 09:06:18 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Jan 11 09:05:30 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-112) add Message.getJMSDeliveryCount() (Wed Jan 9 10:36:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-109) add method Destination.getName() (Wed Jan 9 10:17:50 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Fri Jan 4 13:23:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Tue Dec 18 17:03:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Sun Nov 4 06:39:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Fri Oct 26 07:06:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco 2012 (Mon Oct 8 17:23:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 17:22:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 07:07:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 04:33:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Tue Oct 23 04:31:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 16:55:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Apr 4 06:46:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Mon Apr 23 03:29:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Fri Apr 20 06:46:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Wed Apr 4 04:18:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Draft JMS 2.0 javadocs can now be browsed online (Wed Apr 18 09:31:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Apr 10 08:27:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-4) Properties on Messages should follow builder pattern. (Tue Apr 10 08:24:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Mon Apr 9 16:21:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Thu Apr 5 18:58:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Java One BOF? (Thu Apr 5 16:45:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces (Thu Mar 29 06:40:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Mar 5 17:48:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 03:58:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Mon Mar 5 16:36:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Mar 28 08:48:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 08:43:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Mar 27 07:34:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 06:56:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 03:45:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Sat Mar 24 07:45:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding (Fri Mar 2 13:49:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Mar 15 18:53:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Feb 28 16:21:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 11:24:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sat Feb 11 07:39:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Fri Jan 6 02:49:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 14:31:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 10:45:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 05:40:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible (Fri Jan 6 16:59:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Thu Dec 1 16:33:05 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Dec 8 08:31:25 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Tue Dec 6 02:47:09 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Thu Dec 1 03:28:57 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Nov 25 09:09:07 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Nov 25 06:16:01 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Wed Nov 23 16:31:37 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Wed Nov 23 16:06:53 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Fri Nov 25 12:25:22 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Fri Nov 25 10:04:20 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Thu Jul 7 05:41:27 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Priorities: Proposal from Julien Dubois (Mon Jun 20 08:37:15 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Interesting CDI issue (Wed Jun 15 02:28:07 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Message Observers (Mon Jun 6 17:33:44 2011)
John Harby
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Tue Jan 31 17:37:36 2017)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Tue Jan 29 10:00:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 1: relationship to topic subscriptions) (Tue Jan 15 13:04:31 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Sat Jan 12 18:11:10 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Fri Dec 21 12:35:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 09:43:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Mon Apr 9 15:12:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Wed Apr 4 21:33:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 29 17:05:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Mar 28 09:24:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Fri Mar 16 11:36:16 2012)
Josh Juneau
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Fri Oct 7 12:54:29 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Fri Sep 11 04:07:11 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Aug 25 04:38:20 2015)
jsr368-experts-request_at_jms-spec.java.net
- [jms-spec users] Welcome to the jsr368-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net mailing list! (Fri Nov 21 06:20:35 2014)
karabot_at_gmail.com
- [jms-spec users] MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Fri Apr 24 15:49:48 2015)
Kevin Sutter
- [jms-spec users] Re: [javaee-spec users] Re: Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 06:09:35 2016)
Lenny Primak
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Fri Oct 7 13:22:15 2016)
Leonardo K. Shikida
- [jms-spec users] (Tue Oct 8 11:34:43 2013)
Leonardo Loch Zanivan
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Fri Jun 5 06:48:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Fri Jun 5 06:41:13 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Thu May 21 08:05:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Mon May 18 17:18:05 2015)
Linda DeMichiel
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition in spec? (Sun Jan 4 20:31:28 2015)
Marina Vatkina
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] Re: [jsr345-experts] Fwd: [jsr342-experts] proposed MDB improvements (Mon Mar 18 10:09:54 2013)
Martijn Verburg
- [jms-spec users] Re: Adopt a JSR JMS 2.0 Workshop in London (Fri Aug 24 02:54:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Adopt a JSR JMS 2.0 Workshop in London (Thu Aug 23 07:31:14 2012)
martijnverburg_at_gmail.com
- [jms-spec users] Adopt a JSR JMS 2.0 Workshop in London (Thu Aug 16 03:37:59 2012)
Matthew White
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Fri May 6 07:06:08 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Mon Jan 19 03:50:01 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories (Wed Jan 14 06:09:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories (Mon Jan 12 08:34:01 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Mon Jan 12 06:12:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Mon Jan 5 04:47:26 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Tue Dec 23 06:21:51 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Fri Dec 19 08:22:47 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Fri Dec 19 05:32:17 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes (Wed Dec 17 08:34:17 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Wed Dec 17 08:18:52 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes (Tue Dec 16 07:40:26 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Confusion about JMSProducer methods and CDI (Tue Jun 17 04:24:14 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] State of a message in a producer after send (Fri Dec 13 08:45:48 2013)
- [jms-spec users] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office (returning 20/02/2013) (Tue Feb 19 14:22:41 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office (returning 20/02/2013) (Tue Feb 19 02:31:19 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office sick (returning 28/01/2013) (Fri Jan 25 02:04:46 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office until 3rd January (returning 02/01/2013) (Fri Dec 21 14:53:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office until 3rd January (returning 02/01/2013) (Fri Dec 21 14:53:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] AUTO: Matthew White/UK/IBM is out of the office until 13th August 2012 (returning 13/08/2012) (Thu Aug 2 08:13:52 2012)
Nicholas Wright
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Nov 12 09:19:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Nov 12 08:09:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Mon Nov 12 07:49:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-105) Provide API to allow an app server or resource adapter to obtain a XAResource from a JMSContext (Mon Nov 12 07:32:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Mon Nov 12 07:20:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Fri Sep 7 08:27:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Fri Sep 7 04:49:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Tue Sep 11 04:41:11 2012)
Nick Wright
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Fri Jul 6 09:14:55 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Fri Jul 13 02:39:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Fri Jul 13 02:32:19 2012)
Nigel Deakin
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-51) Change Session.createDurableSubscriber() to return a MessageConsumer (Tue Jan 3 07:34:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Tue Nov 29 03:23:48 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Tue Nov 29 01:28:26 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Fri Oct 7 01:23:46 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Thu Oct 6 09:16:05 2016)
- [jms-spec users] The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Oct 5 01:47:47 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] update to Java EE 8 plan (Thu Aug 25 01:28:17 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? (Fri Apr 29 01:28:41 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub (Fri Mar 18 02:36:00 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub (Mon Mar 21 12:48:24 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Update (Was Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014) (Fri Jan 15 03:15:45 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Thu Dec 10 06:44:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Wed Dec 9 09:40:30 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Tue Nov 17 07:59:22 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Tue Nov 17 04:45:01 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Mon Nov 16 02:17:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Fri Nov 13 11:48:45 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 expert group and community meeting to discuss flexible JMS MDBs (Thu Nov 12 08:59:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.1 expert group and community meeting to discuss flexible JMS MDBs (Tue Nov 10 10:47:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Mon Nov 30 02:16:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Fri Nov 20 10:53:26 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Fri Nov 20 04:35:35 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Wed Nov 18 09:03:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne presentation: what's (probably) coming in JMS 2.1 (Mon Nov 2 16:12:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Tue Oct 6 08:57:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Mon Oct 5 08:33:39 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 19 Oct 2015 (Fri Oct 30 17:07:30 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.1 plan (Fri Oct 30 15:13:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 19 Oct 2015 (Fri Oct 30 14:18:41 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Wed Oct 28 14:59:08 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JavaOne presentation: what's (probably) coming in JMS 2.1 (Tue Oct 27 08:30:31 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.1 Early Draft 1 is posted (Thu Oct 22 21:04:52 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Thu Oct 22 14:57:35 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Thu Oct 22 09:35:07 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JavaOne San Francisco 2015 (Fri Oct 2 08:30:05 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Tue Oct 20 09:21:21 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 09:18:57 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 01:48:42 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Mon Oct 19 07:19:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Tue Oct 13 05:03:02 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery (Tue Oct 13 04:57:01 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery (Tue Oct 13 04:56:54 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Tue Oct 13 04:48:38 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Fri Oct 2 06:40:58 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Mon Oct 12 09:49:23 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery (Mon Oct 12 08:03:42 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JavaOne 2015: Come to the GlassFish - NetBeans - Payara Party (Wed Oct 7 07:57:30 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Wed Oct 7 03:57:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Proposal to release Early Draft 1 (Tue Oct 6 09:54:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Thu Oct 1 03:38:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Sep 8 04:29:10 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Mon Sep 7 08:01:56 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Fri Sep 4 04:38:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Wed Sep 2 07:30:08 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Wed Sep 2 07:24:13 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: (Wed Sep 30 10:00:57 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Welcome new expert group member: Ivar Grimstad (Fri Sep 11 06:56:21 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: simplifying the annotations (Fri Sep 11 02:06:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: simplifying the annotations (Thu Sep 10 09:21:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Sep 1 04:35:17 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Wed Aug 12 07:30:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Make Message Poisoning Handling a priority? (Wed Aug 12 06:56:53 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Fri Aug 28 08:30:38 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 Ideas (Fri Aug 28 04:33:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Fri Aug 28 03:41:32 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 12:21:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 09:45:02 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 07:37:50 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] Re: Improvements for JMS MDBs (Thu Aug 6 07:53:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Wed Aug 26 03:33:07 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Aug 25 03:48:23 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Issue I18: Legacy MessageListener and @JMSListener compatibility (Wed Aug 5 03:38:23 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Mon Aug 24 10:42:53 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Mon Aug 24 09:37:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Mon Aug 24 07:51:32 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-172: Make it easier to find JMS Resources (Thu Aug 13 02:27:21 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: About JMS_SPEC-116 (Tue Jul 28 02:02:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: About JMS_SPEC-116 (Mon Jul 27 02:46:31 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Thu Jul 23 05:02:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Thu Jun 11 07:22:02 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.1 schedule update (Thu Jun 11 05:11:45 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Wed Jun 10 02:58:39 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Jun 9 10:29:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Jun 30 09:30:34 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Jun 30 09:23:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Thu Jun 4 06:43:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Thu May 21 07:42:50 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Posting to this list (users_at_jms-spec.java.net) (Tue May 19 03:23:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Mon May 18 03:00:57 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Fri May 1 08:52:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Wed Apr 29 04:49:05 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 03:19:10 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata is now released (Mon Mar 16 15:33:39 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Mon Mar 16 11:46:50 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 12:39:13 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 12:28:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Mon Mar 16 03:44:58 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 10:06:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 09:39:10 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 07:36:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 07:29:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-167: Session javadoc should mention consumer.close is allowed outside thread of control (Thu Feb 12 08:18:28 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-167: Session javadoc should mention consumer.close is allowed outside thread of control (Thu Feb 12 08:01:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 2 05:52:39 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata now available for formal review (Tue Jan 27 03:23:54 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata now available for formal review (Tue Jan 27 03:22:41 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: MS_SPEC-164 (Typos in section 7.3.5 and 12.2: Change Session to MessageProducer) (Fri Jan 2 03:38:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 16 08:18:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories (Thu Jan 15 09:52:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories (Tue Jan 13 09:15:29 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories (Mon Jan 12 11:29:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-166: Define that the JMS provider should call reset on a StreamMessage passed to a CompletionListener (Mon Jan 12 10:34:26 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Mon Jan 12 10:15:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 2 02:39:05 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-165: Error in javadoc for Connection#stop and JMSContext#stop (Thu Jan 8 06:31:49 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Tue Jan 6 10:15:34 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Tue Jan 6 10:11:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Tue Jan 6 09:48:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Mon Jan 5 05:55:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 2 02:30:20 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) (Tue Dec 9 08:33:11 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Tue Dec 9 07:51:39 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Tue Dec 9 04:51:24 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) (Thu Dec 4 06:42:52 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) (Thu Dec 4 04:30:05 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-157 (JMS 2.0 introduced an incompatible restriction on creating two sessions per connection in Java EE) (Tue Dec 2 04:34:23 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-160 (JMS API source contains self-closing HTML tags) (Mon Dec 1 07:25:08 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Mon Dec 22 04:20:00 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-133: Update javadoc comments for QueueConnection#createQueueSession and TopicConnection#createTopicSession (Mon Dec 22 03:36:21 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Fri Dec 19 11:06:02 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Thu Dec 18 09:57:11 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Thu Dec 18 09:02:22 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-163 (Javadoc for JMSContext#setClientID contains obsolete MessageContext reference) (Mon Dec 1 04:58:12 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-157 (JMS 2.0 introduced an incompatible restriction on creating two sessions per connection in Java EE) (Thu Dec 18 06:32:50 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes (Wed Dec 17 10:56:20 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) (Wed Dec 17 10:07:21 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) (Tue Dec 16 10:33:55 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes (Tue Dec 16 09:07:47 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes (Tue Dec 9 09:59:20 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-162 (Typos in section 7.3 "Asynchronous send") (Mon Dec 1 04:32:24 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Thu Nov 27 10:49:30 2014)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Thu Nov 27 07:29:14 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) (Tue Nov 25 08:33:07 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) (Tue Nov 25 07:34:10 2014)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 errata (Thu Nov 20 06:39:00 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 (JSR 368) expert group (Mon Oct 6 14:02:38 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 (JSR 368) expert group (Mon Oct 6 11:58:26 2014)
- [jms-spec users] JSR 368 (JMS 2.1) has been approved (Tue Sep 23 09:49:22 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JavaOne 2014: JMS BOF and "meet the spec lead" (Fri Sep 19 04:27:49 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.1 (JSR 368) expert group (Fri Sep 19 03:03:27 2014)
- [jms-spec users] JSR 368 (JMS 2.1) is now submitted and open for formal review (Thu Aug 28 06:07:26 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.1 Draft JSR (Mon Aug 4 06:48:54 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.1 Draft JSR (Tue Jul 15 03:48:49 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.1 Draft JSR (Fri Jul 11 06:32:32 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.1 Draft JSR (Mon Jul 7 13:30:19 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS spec on Twitter (Mon Jul 7 13:18:14 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.1 Draft JSR (Mon Jul 7 12:41:47 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Confusion about JMSProducer methods and CDI (Tue Jun 17 06:10:28 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Confusion about JMSProducer methods and CDI (Mon Jun 9 03:40:13 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Java EE 8 Community Survey (results and next phase) (Wed Feb 26 09:18:52 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-144) StreamMessage#getBody(Class<T>) (Thu Jan 23 02:59:37 2014)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: [jsr342-experts] Java EE 8 features survey (Thu Dec 12 02:03:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 08:02:19 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification on JMSContext::createConsumer (Mon Dec 9 07:51:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: State of a message in a producer after send (Fri Dec 13 09:37:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Sending a previously-received Message and supporting JMSXUserID (Fri Dec 13 02:19:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Sending a previously-received Message and supporting JMSXUserID (Thu Dec 12 11:20:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: PoolSize Configuration (Wed Nov 20 03:30:16 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Wed Sep 18 03:03:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Sep 19 09:30:50 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Where next for JMS? (Thu Sep 19 09:16:13 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Individual Client ACK (Thu Sep 19 08:08:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] JMS 2.0 session creation in MDB lifecycle callback (Thu Aug 22 10:03:06 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] JMS 2.0 session creation in MDB lifecycle callback (Thu Aug 22 07:13:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco (Fri Jul 26 07:07:02 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: TCK Issue - com.sun.ts.tests.jms.core20.jmsproducerqueuetests.Client.msgPropertiesTest (Thu Jul 25 02:51:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco (Tue Jul 23 04:10:25 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS at JavaOne San Francisco (Mon Jul 22 03:09:49 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Tue Jun 25 02:07:41 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Clarification about JMSContext and setClientID (Tue Jun 25 06:00:49 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] OTN articles: What's New in JMS 2.0 (Fri Jun 7 02:53:07 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Mon May 20 07:04:37 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 07:05:09 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 06:38:55 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Tue May 7 06:27:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 is now released! (Thu May 23 04:28:01 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-121) Injection of JMSContext objects not possible in a WebSocket @OnMessage or @OnClose callback method (Mon May 20 09:56:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-119) Remove reference to password alias (Tue May 7 02:16:01 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 final approval ballot is approved (Tue Apr 9 02:32:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Mar 12 05:27:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] proposed MDB improvements (Tue Mar 12 04:49:45 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Thu Mar 7 02:19:25 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Mar 6 06:06:32 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 final release has now been submitted (Wed Mar 20 14:05:06 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 final submission is this week (Mon Mar 18 12:54:38 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] Re: [jsr345-experts] Fwd: [jsr342-experts] proposed MDB improvements (Mon Mar 18 03:17:34 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Mar 6 04:25:42 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Mon Mar 18 02:50:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Sat Mar 16 08:52:03 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Fri Mar 15 05:31:30 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Wed Mar 13 09:38:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Mar 12 06:47:50 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Mar 12 06:17:25 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Final editorial changes in the JMS 2.0 spec (Fri Mar 1 10:12:56 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Mon Feb 4 02:47:18 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Mon Feb 4 02:46:46 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Fri Feb 1 08:36:37 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Proposed final draft is published (Wed Feb 27 05:45:27 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting (Mon Feb 25 11:49:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting (Mon Feb 25 10:17:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JavaOne 2012: What's New in Java Message Service 2.0 - Video now available (Fri Feb 22 02:22:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Proposed final draft is now submitted (Wed Feb 20 10:38:09 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Wed Feb 20 04:54:31 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Fri Feb 1 08:07:49 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Wed Feb 20 04:13:07 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Tue Feb 19 09:50:38 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue (Tue Feb 19 08:48:43 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public Review Ballot complete (Tue Feb 19 01:35:01 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Fri Feb 1 07:38:25 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-114) Clarify javadoc descriptions of XAQueueConnection#createSession and XATopicSession#createSession (Thu Feb 14 06:47:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Inconsistence on Javadoc regarding XAQueueConnection and XAConnection (Thu Feb 14 06:21:02 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Dropping noLocal from shared subscriptions (Tue Feb 12 09:19:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Rules on calling consumer.close() (Tue Feb 12 06:40:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Mon Feb 11 08:47:01 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Mon Feb 11 07:59:13 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Feb 8 07:54:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Feb 8 07:44:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Feb 1 07:14:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances (Thu Feb 7 10:05:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Thu Feb 7 07:54:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Specification Document - Reorganisation (Wed Feb 6 11:32:31 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public draft review now complete (Wed Feb 6 11:29:44 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 PR: Feedback from Goldman Sachs (Wed Feb 6 05:23:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Collecting issues for JMS 2.next? (Tue Feb 5 07:28:27 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances (Mon Feb 4 11:39:36 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 PR: Feedback from Goldman Sachs (Mon Feb 4 03:52:21 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Fri Feb 1 06:30:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances (Mon Jan 28 11:43:31 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Mon Jan 28 07:47:53 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-69) Clarify that QueueRequestor and TopicRequestor only work in a non-transacted session with auto or dups-ok ack (Mon Jan 28 04:58:37 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Thu Jan 3 10:48:44 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Tue Jan 22 03:29:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Mon Jan 21 10:57:37 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.2.1 Simplified API: Injecting a JMSContext (Mon Jan 21 09:16:32 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: Drop maxIdleTime from <jms-connection-factory> and JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition (Mon Jan 21 08:12:16 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Mon Jan 21 07:29:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Mon Jan 21 04:53:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Fri Jan 18 10:52:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 07:37:50 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 04:03:09 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Wed Jan 16 10:28:38 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft is now published (Thu Jan 3 10:19:11 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 1: relationship to topic subscriptions) (Tue Jan 15 07:52:38 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Tue Jan 15 03:52:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late change: A.2.1 Simplified API: Injecting a JMSContext (Tue Jan 15 03:29:30 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Late change: Drop maxIdleTime from <jms-connection-factory> and JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition (Mon Jan 14 07:55:27 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Jan 14 07:33:22 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: FasoJUG join effort of "Adopt JSR #343" (Mon Jan 14 06:12:46 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 late change: Activation property subscriptionScope (Mon Jan 14 06:08:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 late change: Activation property subscriptionScope (Fri Jan 11 08:30:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Thu Jan 3 08:58:01 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Jan 11 08:07:34 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMSException#getCause() (Fri Jan 11 04:04:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-112) add Message.getJMSDeliveryCount() (Wed Jan 9 10:34:31 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-109) add method Destination.getName() (Wed Jan 9 10:08:37 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-108) add generics to methods currently returning raw types (Mon Jan 7 09:58:26 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public Draft is now published (Thu Jan 3 08:40:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Mon Jan 7 04:57:20 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMSProducer#getProperyNames() (Mon Jan 7 04:40:20 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMSProducer#getProperyNames() (Fri Jan 4 02:57:36 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Fri Jan 4 02:35:46 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Fri Dec 7 12:59:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Thu Dec 6 10:33:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-107) Extend connection consumer API to support shared durable and non-durable subscriptions (Thu Dec 6 09:57:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Specify that connection.stop() or close() may not be called from a MessageListener (Wed Dec 5 09:21:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Specify that connection.stop() or close() may not be called from a MessageListener (Wed Dec 5 06:41:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Specify that connection.stop() or close() may not be called from a MessageListener (Wed Dec 5 06:24:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances (Tue Dec 4 11:25:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JSR 343 has moved to JCP 2.9 (Sat Dec 22 07:10:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Wed Dec 19 08:45:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Wed Dec 19 07:59:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] For information: JSR-322 is starting (Tue Dec 4 11:22:53 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Thu Nov 8 11:20:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Thu Nov 8 07:19:15 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple consumers to be created on the same topic subscription (Wed Nov 7 07:43:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Mon Nov 5 11:29:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Mon Nov 5 07:22:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Is anyone interested in writing about JMS 2.0? (Thu Nov 29 11:34:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-105) Provide API to allow an app server or resource adapter to obtain a XAResource from a JMSContext (Mon Nov 26 09:55:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple consumers to be created on the same topic subscription (Wed Nov 21 09:11:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Mon Nov 19 11:15:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Mon Nov 19 02:25:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Fri Nov 16 07:08:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-106) Methods on JMSContext that are disallowed if the context is injected should throw a IllegalStateException not a JMSException (Wed Nov 14 07:19:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple consumers to be created on the same topic subscription (Wed Nov 14 06:47:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Wed Nov 14 06:30:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Nov 12 08:51:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Nov 12 07:48:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Mon Nov 12 07:40:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS2.0 javadocs (Mon Nov 12 03:16:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Updated JMS 2.0 spec schedule (Thu Nov 1 13:42:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: jms2.0 spec adoption into glassfish (Fri Oct 19 03:36:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: jms2.0 spec adoption into glassfish (Thu Oct 18 10:54:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS20Demo app on diff configurations (Wed Oct 31 04:47:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-105) Provide API to allow an app server or resource adapter to obtain a XAResource from a JMSContext (Tue Oct 30 13:04:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS2.0 javadocs (Tue Oct 30 09:17:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Tue Oct 30 04:58:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS20Demo app on diff configurations (Mon Oct 29 05:49:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Mon Oct 29 04:00:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco 2012 (Tue Oct 9 10:00:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Fri Oct 26 11:09:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Fri Oct 26 09:05:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Fri Oct 26 07:36:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Fri Oct 26 07:00:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Wed Oct 24 04:04:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 11:01:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 05:01:52 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco 2012 (Mon Oct 8 16:49:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Tue Oct 23 04:29:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Tue Oct 23 03:41:51 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 09:44:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 09:18:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 08:42:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne San Francisco 2012 (Mon Oct 1 19:23:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Thu Sep 13 08:34:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Thu Sep 13 10:38:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Fri Sep 7 08:53:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Fri Sep 7 02:54:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-77) MapMessage.setBytes API discrepancy found in the javadocs (Mon Sep 3 10:41:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS at JavaOne San Francisco 2012 (Fri Sep 28 04:40:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting JMSContext objects (Mon Sep 3 09:08:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Observer (Mon Sep 24 03:49:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri Sep 21 07:35:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Wed Sep 19 08:42:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Mon Sep 17 12:06:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Mon Sep 17 09:55:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Fri Sep 14 08:41:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Tue Sep 11 04:13:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Mon Sep 10 04:51:15 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Mon Sep 3 09:08:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Adopt a JSR JMS 2.0 Workshop in London (Fri Aug 17 02:36:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-98) Fix findbugs warnings in JMSException, JMSRuntimeException, QueueRequestor, TopicRequestor (Thu Aug 16 03:26:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Aug 8 09:48:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Aug 2 07:47:15 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-57) Add Java EE 7 multi-tenancy support (Thu Aug 30 15:28:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Java EE 7 roadmap (Thu Aug 30 11:19:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Adopt a JSR JMS 2.0 Workshop in London (Fri Aug 24 02:29:15 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Thu Aug 2 07:47:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS Topics and historical data (Mon Jul 9 11:16:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Mon Jul 9 11:12:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Mon Jul 9 09:57:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Mon Jul 9 09:22:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Pravesh Pandya (Mon Jul 9 03:05:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) (Tue Jul 24 08:18:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Jul 18 09:16:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Mon Jul 16 09:41:53 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Mon Jul 16 09:39:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri Jul 13 02:22:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Thu Jul 12 11:06:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Wed Jul 11 04:42:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Tue Jul 10 03:24:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: What is the expected value returned by setClientID when client identifier is unset? (Mon Jul 9 11:22:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances (Fri Jun 15 08:41:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS at JavaOne (Fri Jun 15 07:20:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed Jun 13 09:56:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Jun 11 04:37:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) (Fri Jun 29 10:59:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Jun 29 10:33:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Fri Jun 29 02:30:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Thu Jun 28 04:05:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes (Thu Jun 28 03:22:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: question about scope of shared non-durable and durable subscriptions (Thu Jun 28 03:02:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed Jun 27 03:04:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Jun 1 09:07:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 07:38:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Thu May 17 08:02:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-93) Does changing the noLocal flag when connecting to a durable subscription cause the durable subscription to be deleted? (Tue May 15 07:43:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Tue May 15 07:27:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-80) Error in example 9.3.3.2 "Reconnect to a topic using a durable subscription" (Mon May 14 08:48:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Batch Messages really abandoned? (Mon May 14 03:29:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Thu May 31 03:00:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed May 30 10:30:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed May 30 07:28:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri May 25 08:58:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Wed May 23 04:50:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Wed May 23 04:40:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Tue May 22 04:54:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 11:23:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Tue May 1 07:24:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri May 18 10:45:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri May 18 08:49:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 08:21:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue May 1 04:20:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Apr 4 07:05:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Thu Apr 26 08:27:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Wed Apr 25 04:20:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Apr 24 09:12:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Mon Apr 23 09:47:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Apr 4 06:42:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-31) Allow session.createQueue and createTopic to create server side destinations case they don't exist (Mon Apr 23 09:22:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Mon Apr 23 03:25:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Mon Apr 23 03:04:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Fri Apr 20 08:21:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Fri Apr 20 07:38:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Fri Apr 20 06:16:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Fri Apr 20 02:11:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Apr 19 08:18:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Apr 19 08:04:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Thu Apr 19 07:48:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-31) Allow session.createQueue and createTopic to create server side destinations case they don't exist (Thu Apr 19 07:10:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Draft JMS 2.0 javadocs can now be browsed online (Wed Apr 18 10:21:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Draft JMS 2.0 javadocs can now be browsed online (Wed Apr 18 07:30:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Tue Apr 17 09:58:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Wed Apr 4 04:15:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 17 06:56:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Wed Apr 11 07:25:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-31) Allow session.createQueue and createTopic to create server side destinations case they don't exist (Wed Apr 11 06:45:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 10:25:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-31) Allow session.createQueue and createTopic to create server side destinations case they don't exist (Tue Apr 10 09:51:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 10 08:11:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 10 07:57:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Apr 10 07:53:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-61) Selector on JMS body (Tue Apr 10 05:59:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-4) Properties on Messages should follow builder pattern. (Tue Apr 10 05:55:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Apr 10 04:31:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 03:56:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 3 08:43:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 03:22:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Tue Apr 10 02:44:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Mon Apr 9 11:57:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Mon Apr 9 07:52:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Thu Apr 5 08:40:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Apr 4 07:40:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-4) Properties on Messages should follow builder pattern. (Wed Apr 4 07:28:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-61) Selector on JMS body (Wed Apr 4 07:20:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 3 07:57:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Fri Mar 30 08:31:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Fri Mar 30 07:09:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Fri Mar 30 06:58:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-93) Does changing the noLocal flag when connecting to a durable subscription cause the durable subscription to be deleted? (Fri Mar 30 04:03:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces (Fri Mar 30 03:36:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces (Thu Mar 29 06:29:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Poison Message Handling (Thu Mar 29 05:50:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 29 04:56:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 04:19:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 03:27:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 03:21:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Wed Mar 28 07:58:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Mar 28 07:13:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Mar 27 10:25:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 08:28:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-9) Support for AMQP messaging (Mon Mar 5 08:32:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Mar 27 07:30:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Tue Mar 27 06:28:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 03:59:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Tue Mar 27 03:05:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-46) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 27 03:01:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Mon Mar 5 03:17:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Fri Mar 23 03:11:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Thu Mar 22 11:20:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Thu Mar 22 08:50:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 22 03:06:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Mar 21 11:14:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Mar 21 09:08:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Mar 21 07:31:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 09:35:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 08:05:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 07:45:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 06:03:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Tue Mar 20 02:50:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Mon Mar 19 05:44:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted (Fri Mar 16 09:02:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Fri Mar 16 07:36:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Fri Mar 16 05:46:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Thu Mar 15 05:49:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 15 05:35:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Tue Mar 13 12:02:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Fri Mar 2 08:44:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Mon Mar 12 11:13:53 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted (Mon Mar 12 08:10:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted (Mon Mar 12 04:11:09 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-67) Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination (Fri Mar 9 07:53:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Mar 7 07:25:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Revised schedule for JSR 343 (Tue Mar 6 03:49:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding (Fri Mar 2 07:18:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 10 07:27:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 07:15:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 07:01:09 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Feb 29 04:34:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted (Wed Feb 29 04:01:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Feb 28 10:47:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome John Harby (Thu Feb 23 07:43:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-77) MapMessage.setBytes API discrepancy found in the javadocs (Wed Feb 22 07:18:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Feb 22 04:45:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 05:00:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: General suggestions from Florian Beaufumé (Tue Feb 21 04:44:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] General suggestions from Florian Beaufumé (Tue Feb 21 02:22:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Feb 20 07:43:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Feb 20 06:05:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Feb 20 05:45:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 17 10:13:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 17 08:02:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 17 05:06:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Thu Feb 16 05:01:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome John Archibold (Thu Feb 16 04:17:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Feb 14 09:17:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 06:47:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 02:57:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Wed Feb 8 07:27:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 10:36:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 06:11:11 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 04:56:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 04:47:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Sun Feb 5 11:43:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 10:10:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 08:23:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Fri Feb 3 06:33:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible (Fri Jan 6 06:30:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-38) Allow JMS clients to specify whether a message is compressed in transit (Fri Jan 6 04:57:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-69) Clarify that QueueRequestor and TopicRequestor only work in a non-transacted session with auto or dups-ok ack (Mon Jan 30 04:14:51 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-27) Clarify the relationship between the JMS and other Java EE specifications (Thu Jan 26 11:01:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession (Tue Jan 24 11:46:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Andrew Kennedy (Fri Jan 20 04:50:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Thu Jan 19 11:01:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (CDI questions) (Thu Jan 19 10:34:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription (Wed Jan 18 04:36:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Jan 18 03:48:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Wed Jan 18 02:16:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Specify that connection.stop() or close() may not be called from a MessageListener (Wed Jan 4 07:58:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Tue Jan 17 01:42:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() (Mon Jan 16 07:44:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession (Fri Jan 13 08:11:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: Fwd: Re: TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored (Fri Jan 13 07:13:15 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JSR 343: Transition to JCP 2.8 (Wed Jan 4 02:32:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored (Fri Jan 13 06:39:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession (Thu Jan 12 07:43:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Matthew White (Wed Jan 11 03:04:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Nick Wright (Tue Jan 10 07:22:55 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-67) Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination (Tue Jan 10 04:48:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Tue Jan 10 04:41:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Tue Jan 10 04:37:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-49) Improve specification of ExceptionListener (Tue Jan 3 10:17:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Sastry Malladi! (Mon Jan 9 10:42:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 10:39:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Mon Jan 9 09:35:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-50) Clarify that JMS providers must implement both P2P and Pub-Sub (Tue Jan 3 08:44:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 06:01:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 04:06:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination (Mon Jan 9 03:36:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible (Mon Jan 9 02:22:29 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Fri Jan 6 06:36:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-34) Calling setJMSDeliveryMode or setJMSPriority on a javax.jms.Message before it is sent don't have any effect (Thu Dec 22 08:50:23 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Thu Dec 22 07:40:07 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription (Thu Dec 22 07:28:08 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription (Wed Dec 21 10:49:52 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription (Wed Dec 21 10:41:35 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-42) Make support for JMSXDeliveryCount mandatory (Tue Dec 20 11:01:01 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-52) Clarify that a message may be sent using a different session from that used to create the message (Mon Dec 19 09:31:42 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Mon Dec 19 07:44:23 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Fri Dec 16 10:54:29 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Fri Dec 16 09:10:17 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Fri Dec 16 04:48:04 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Fri Dec 16 02:31:41 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Thu Dec 15 10:27:30 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Thu Dec 15 09:52:35 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Wed Dec 14 05:58:00 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Thu Dec 1 10:12:05 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Dec 14 02:15:27 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Mon Dec 12 07:52:40 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Mon Dec 12 07:46:21 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Fri Dec 9 06:46:20 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Dec 8 09:27:18 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Thu Dec 8 08:32:45 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Dec 8 06:51:05 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Welcome Rob Davies (Tue Dec 6 03:14:52 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Rob Davies (Tue Dec 6 02:19:31 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Nov 25 09:28:31 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Thu Nov 24 08:01:43 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Mon Nov 28 06:41:36 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Fri Nov 25 11:34:03 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Fri Nov 25 09:41:03 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: {JMS_SPEC-30} Define mandatory activation config properties for JMS MDBs (Fri Jul 22 06:21:23 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Message Observers (Tue Jun 7 01:54:51 2011)
nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com
- [jms-spec users] Re: java.net.jms-spec has been migrated to GitHub and groups.io discussion service (Thu May 11 04:54:00 2017)
Oleg Tsal-Tsalko
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple consumers to be created on the same topic subscription (Sat Nov 10 09:54:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Sun Nov 18 07:32:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS2.0 javadocs (Sat Nov 10 10:34:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: jms2.0 spec adoption into glassfish (Fri Oct 19 04:56:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] jms2.0 spec adoption into glassfish (Fri Oct 19 02:38:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] jms2.0 spec adoption into glassfish (Thu Oct 18 05:55:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS20Demo app on diff configurations (Tue Oct 30 14:40:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Mon Oct 29 15:56:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] JMS2.0 javadocs (Sun Oct 28 14:13:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] JMS20Demo app on diff configurations (Sun Oct 28 05:27:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getBody(Class<T> c) (Fri Oct 26 13:32:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-102) Make JMSConsumer.receivePayload methods consistent with Message.getBody (Fri Oct 26 13:11:52 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Fri Oct 26 13:00:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Wed Oct 24 12:53:33 2012)
pangalz_at_gmail.com
- [jms-spec users] Security alignment of JMS (Sat May 16 13:46:33 2015)
Pete Muir
- [jms-spec users] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Tue Oct 23 03:45:51 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 10:29:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Feedback from JavaOne talk (Mon Oct 22 08:54:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 10:32:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 09:55:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Mar 7 08:37:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 6 08:38:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 02:48:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 13:49:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 06:59:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 01:49:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 01:49:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: WebContainer API on Servlets (Sat Feb 11 12:58:12 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sat Feb 11 09:32:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sat Feb 11 05:17:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Fri Dec 2 04:15:09 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Fwd: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Tue Dec 6 01:30:20 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Tue Dec 6 01:11:28 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Thu Nov 24 00:27:42 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Wed Nov 23 04:37:43 2011)
Philippe Marschall
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.1 Ideas (Sun Aug 30 05:24:34 2015)
- [jms-spec users] StreamMessage#getBody(Class<T>) (Thu Dec 26 02:02:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] Re: [jsr345-experts] Fwd: [jsr342-experts] proposed MDB improvements (Mon Mar 18 02:54:03 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-116) Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Mon Mar 18 02:11:17 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Thu Jan 3 14:21:42 2013)
- [jms-spec users] JMSProducer#getProperyNames() (Thu Jan 3 14:14:15 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] Re: Re: Singleton MDB? (Sat Jan 12 07:05:19 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [ejb-spec users] [jsr345-experts] Re: Re: Singleton MDB? (Tue Jan 8 23:10:25 2013)
- [jms-spec users] JMSException#getCause() (Sat Jan 5 05:27:04 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Sat Jan 5 04:44:13 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Fri Jan 4 13:12:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMSProducer#getProperyNames() (Fri Jan 4 10:57:54 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Make TemporaryQueue/Topic AutoCloseable? (Wed Jan 2 08:29:56 2013)
Rafael Soares
- [jms-spec users] Observer (Fri Sep 21 13:59:20 2012)
Rahman USTA
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 10:49:56 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Organizing CDI workshop for Java EE specs during Java One (Fri Oct 2 06:50:41 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Tue Aug 25 04:13:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: About JMS_SPEC-116 (Tue Jul 28 02:11:55 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: About JMS_SPEC-116 (Mon Jul 27 10:51:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] About JMS_SPEC-116 (Sat Jul 25 05:23:12 2015)
Reza Rahman
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 07:53:53 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 10:46:36 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition in spec? (Sun Jan 4 20:07:48 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Aug 2 09:04:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Thu Aug 2 08:59:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) (Thu Jul 5 21:19:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS at JavaOne (Sun Jun 17 09:04:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sun Jun 3 16:44:38 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Jun 29 10:58:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Jun 1 12:05:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sun Jun 17 09:25:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 08:54:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Mon Apr 23 16:42:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Fri Apr 20 17:48:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Wed Apr 11 09:48:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 07:20:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding (Fri Mar 2 14:54:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Mon Mar 19 17:47:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Thu Mar 15 11:35:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container (Fri Mar 30 17:55:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Sat Feb 18 09:11:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Feb 14 17:47:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Thu Feb 9 20:10:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 10 18:32:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Tue Jan 17 15:27:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Tue Jan 10 06:57:35 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Tue Dec 13 17:46:29 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Tue Dec 13 15:52:10 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Dec 8 07:07:48 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Interesting CDI issue (Wed Jun 15 08:34:58 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Message Observers (Mon Jun 6 17:52:59 2011)
reza_rahman
- [jms-spec users] Re: java.net.jms-spec has been migrated to GitHub and groups.io discussion service (Thu May 11 09:55:57 2017)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 12:13:08 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 05:24:05 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Fri Oct 7 05:15:39 2016)
reza_rahman_at_lycos.com
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Java One BOF? (Mon Apr 9 15:08:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Apr 5 16:53:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 29 15:57:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 10:04:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sat Feb 11 09:27:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 10:20:53 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 08:53:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 10 07:57:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 10 07:53:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Thu Jan 19 13:10:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Thu Jan 19 08:01:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() (Tue Jan 17 09:49:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber (Mon Jan 9 11:03:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 11:02:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible (Mon Jan 9 07:08:42 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Mon Dec 5 07:37:19 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS Support for DI (Thu Dec 1 06:57:19 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Mon Dec 5 13:38:04 2011)
Rob Davies
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Public Draft - release candidate 1 is now ready for review (Wed Dec 19 09:17:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Meaning of noLocal with shared non-durable subscriptions (Fri Oct 26 11:18:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-101) New method Message.getPayload(Class<T> c) (Wed Oct 24 04:14:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 3 09:24:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Allow multiple threads in same client to consume messages from the same topic subscription (Tue Apr 3 08:02:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Tue Mar 13 13:28:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Tue Jan 17 03:14:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() (Mon Jan 16 07:53:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription (Wed Dec 21 10:56:25 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Welcome Rob Davies (Tue Dec 6 02:37:48 2011)
Robbie Gemmell
- [jms-spec users] Re: Sending a previously-received Message and supporting JMSXUserID (Fri Dec 13 04:47:24 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Sending a previously-received Message and supporting JMSXUserID (Thu Dec 12 12:59:57 2013)
robbie.gemmell_at_gmail.com
- [jms-spec users] Sending a previously-received Message and supporting JMSXUserID (Thu Dec 12 09:01:26 2013)
Robert Davies
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 is now released! (Thu May 23 04:42:56 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions (Wed Jan 30 00:05:21 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server (Tue Jan 29 10:19:36 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Wed Jan 16 13:34:02 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Jan 11 09:09:03 2013)
Ruediger zu Dohna
- [jms-spec users] Re: (JMS_SPEC-33) Improving the JMS API with API simplifications, annotations and CDI (Mon Aug 1 02:01:39 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Mon Jul 4 09:42:21 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Priorities: Proposal from Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Jun 7 03:18:59 2011)
Ryan Cuprak
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Thu Dec 10 07:14:19 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 3 on 19 Nov 2014 (Wed Dec 9 10:26:35 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JMS 2.1 Ideas (Tue Aug 25 21:20:28 2015)
Rüdiger zu Dohna
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Thu Jul 2 02:37:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Wed Jun 17 02:06:15 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Mon May 4 00:45:53 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: MessageListener::onMessage Replacement? (Fri May 1 01:29:09 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] devoxx 2013 (Mon Nov 11 02:45:28 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 is now released! (Thu May 23 04:40:47 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage (Thu Jan 24 13:12:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Thu Jan 24 13:11:51 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 23:24:05 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) (Thu Jan 17 12:01:29 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 late change: Activation property subscriptionScope (Fri Jan 11 08:36:41 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() (Fri Jan 11 08:22:06 2013)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMSProducer#getProperyNames() (Sun Jan 6 23:44:00 2013)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements (Mon Nov 19 23:43:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Mon Nov 12 23:12:20 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Tue Jul 17 01:06:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Fri Jul 13 00:08:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay (Tue Jul 10 23:12:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) (Tue Jul 10 00:18:21 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Tue Jul 10 00:11:49 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server (Tue Jul 3 00:24:03 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sun Jun 3 13:10:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-47) Deprecate domain-specific APIs and propose for removal (Fri May 18 09:40:43 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Thu Apr 26 02:22:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Wed Apr 25 00:48:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Apr 24 02:50:52 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Sat Apr 21 15:18:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-94) Define what characters are valid in a durable (or shared subscription) name (Thu Apr 19 23:46:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Wed Apr 11 00:29:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-31) Allow session.createQueue and createTopic to create server side destinations case they don't exist (Tue Apr 10 23:02:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Apr 10 22:51:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 00:24:09 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Apr 10 00:21:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-61) Selector on JMS body (Wed Apr 4 10:29:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces (Fri Mar 30 02:35:02 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 29 05:57:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Poison Message Handling (Thu Mar 29 04:28:50 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 04:01:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Thu Mar 29 03:57:28 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Mar 27 11:30:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way (Tue Mar 27 10:45:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Mon Mar 26 00:34:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Sat Mar 24 03:04:37 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Fri Mar 23 00:43:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Thu Mar 22 09:37:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Thu Mar 22 01:14:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? (Wed Mar 21 11:20:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage (Wed Mar 21 09:04:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Wed Mar 21 08:48:01 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Wed Mar 21 08:25:40 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 08:25:51 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 07:34:47 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Tue Mar 20 06:30:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches (Mon Mar 19 10:45:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding (Mon Mar 19 10:48:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Mon Mar 19 10:48:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Mar 19 10:47:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Mon Mar 19 10:47:22 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Thu Mar 8 23:54:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Mon Feb 20 10:15:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 17 08:42:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Fri Feb 17 08:06:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Fri Feb 17 07:25:34 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 23:41:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Tue Feb 14 03:33:04 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 12:06:18 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Mon Feb 13 06:59:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects (Sun Feb 12 22:33:27 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review (Sun Feb 12 06:00:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (Tue Jan 17 12:44:23 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE (Tue Jan 17 12:49:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() (Mon Jan 16 07:48:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored (Fri Jan 13 01:08:32 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 12:26:00 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration (Mon Jan 9 08:32:06 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible (Mon Jan 9 04:20:31 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Fri Dec 2 00:28:47 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Thu Dec 1 12:57:15 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Make Connection, Session and other interfaces implement AutoCodeable (Fri Dec 16 06:30:26 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Fwd: [jsr343-experts] Re: Slides from Devoxx 2011 (Tue Dec 6 02:22:47 2011)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS Support for DI (Mon Dec 5 12:30:10 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: {JMS_SPEC-30} Define mandatory activation config properties for JMS MDBs (Fri Jul 22 00:34:34 2011)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS over CDI or something else? (Mon Jul 11 07:34:59 2011)
- [jms-spec users] JMS over CDI or something else? (Wed Jun 29 08:32:16 2011)
Sastry Malladi
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Wed Apr 4 16:57:44 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Sun Mar 4 23:16:41 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Fri Mar 30 10:47:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding (Mon Mar 5 21:40:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Welcome Sastry Malladi! (Mon Jan 9 12:16:18 2012)
Stephan Knitelius
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Fri Oct 7 02:25:54 2016)
tobeand
- [jms-spec users] (Wed Apr 13 05:50:53 2011)
Tom Barnes
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Thu Aug 27 14:38:29 2015)
vaquar khan
- [jms-spec users] Re: java.net.jms-spec has been migrated to GitHub and groups.io discussion service (Thu May 11 19:39:00 2017)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Wed Nov 30 06:39:56 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Thu Oct 6 21:44:25 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Thu Nov 19 07:41:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 10:52:08 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: simplifying the annotations (Fri Sep 11 22:56:22 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs (Tue Sep 8 21:25:52 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Make Message Poisoning Handling a priority? (Tue Aug 11 20:20:16 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners (Wed Aug 26 10:31:32 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Security alignment of JMS (Thu Jun 4 11:50:33 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Wed Dec 24 10:36:25 2014)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) (Thu Dec 18 11:58:36 2014)
Werner Keil
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JavaOne 2016 (Sun Apr 17 03:54:12 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Tue Nov 29 01:52:50 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Thu Oct 6 07:57:37 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Thu Oct 6 02:55:37 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Tue Oct 11 02:21:06 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 (Sun Oct 9 08:30:52 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 01:57:10 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Tue Mar 1 01:04:20 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub (Tue Mar 22 01:42:40 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub (Fri Mar 18 02:48:46 2016)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) (Mon Feb 29 04:12:51 2016)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Thu Nov 19 01:43:10 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Minutes of JMS 2.1 Meeting 2 on 12 Nov 2015 (Wed Nov 18 00:32:18 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face Meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 22:40:53 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Face-to-face Meeting at JavaOne (Tue Oct 20 22:40:50 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne (Wed Oct 14 00:22:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] JavaOne (Tue Oct 13 01:58:21 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Digest for list users_at_jms-spec.java.net (Thu Sep 3 07:51:38 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Digest for list users_at_jms-spec.java.net (Mon Sep 14 01:13:23 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: simplifying the annotations (Fri Sep 11 01:30:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Digest for list users_at_jms-spec.java.net (Wed Sep 9 07:24:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Digest for list users_at_jms-spec.java.net (Fri Jul 24 01:22:12 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 10:40:46 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 08:44:36 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 08:05:37 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory (Tue Mar 17 07:55:20 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 2 06:06:52 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 2 05:19:42 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Mon Jan 19 04:12:43 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Fri Jan 16 08:58:41 2015)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments (Tue Dec 23 06:34:49 2014)