users@jms-spec.java.net

[jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-134: Declarative Annotation Based JMS Listeners

From: Rahman USTA <rahman.usta.88_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:13:46 +0300

Hello Nigel;

I think, the proposed suggestion seems quite well.

2015-08-25 13:48 GMT+03:00 Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>:

> On 24/08/2015 15:51, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>
>>
>> To start things off, I've written down some proposals which you can read
>> at
>> https://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/CDIBeansAsJMSListeners
>>
>
> Although this is a JMS feature (and would end up in the JMS spec), it is
> based on CDI so I've invited people on the CDI spec mailing list (which
> anyone can join) to make comments and suggestions as well from a CDI
> perspective.
>
> I'm aware that most of us here, me included, are more familiar with JMS
> than with CDI.
>
> A little discussion has started, which you can read here:
>
> http://cdi-development-mailing-list.1064426.n5.nabble.com/JMS-2-1-Proposal-to-allow-any-CDI-managed-bean-in-a-Java-EE-application-to-listen-for-JMS-messages-tt5711848.html#none
>
> However the principal place to make comments on this proposal is still
> here (users_at_jms-spec.java.net and jsr368-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net which
> forwards to it).
>
> Nigel
>
>


-- 
Rahman USTA
Istanbul JUG
https://github.com/rahmanusta <http://www.kodcu.com/>