Nigel-
I am very pleased to see the proposed changes to the JMS MDBs. The changes
will help JMS to evolve even further, making the API easier to learn and
use. MDBs have been one of those constructs that may be deemed difficult
to use or understand by beginners. The proposed changes make JMS MDBs
easier to understand and more flexible, providing the ability to develop
more sophisticated solutions.
In particular, I am glad to see the proposed change that removes the
requirement to implement javax.jms.MessageListener, as it can sometimes
limit the functionality, making JMS MDBs cumbersome to use. Providing the
ability to define more than one callback method per MDB will increase the
flexibility of MDBs.
I'll review in more detail as time allows, and provide further feedback.
At this time I see the proposed changes as a very positive move in the
right direction.
Best
Josh Juneau
juneau001_at_gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Rahman USTA <rahman.usta.88_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Nigel;
>
> I think, the proposed suggestion seems quite well.
>
> 2015-08-25 13:48 GMT+03:00 Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>:
>
>> On 24/08/2015 15:51, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> To start things off, I've written down some proposals which you can read
>>> at
>>> https://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/CDIBeansAsJMSListeners
>>>
>>
>> Although this is a JMS feature (and would end up in the JMS spec), it is
>> based on CDI so I've invited people on the CDI spec mailing list (which
>> anyone can join) to make comments and suggestions as well from a CDI
>> perspective.
>>
>> I'm aware that most of us here, me included, are more familiar with JMS
>> than with CDI.
>>
>> A little discussion has started, which you can read here:
>>
>> http://cdi-development-mailing-list.1064426.n5.nabble.com/JMS-2-1-Proposal-to-allow-any-CDI-managed-bean-in-a-Java-EE-application-to-listen-for-JMS-messages-tt5711848.html#none
>>
>> However the principal place to make comments on this proposal is still
>> here (users_at_jms-spec.java.net and jsr368-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net which
>> forwards to it).
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rahman USTA
> Istanbul JUG
> https://github.com/rahmanusta <http://www.kodcu.com/>
>