Hi,
Thanks for picking up the discussion.
I know first-hand, because Heather also asked Spec Leads in particular,
that "Adopt-a-JSR" is a key aim of Hackergarten especially at JavaOne. So
while the general description is "Open Source projects" and we also think
about e.g. doing something on Tamaya (John, if you're interested, happy to
have you on join as a very active participant and committer;-) JSRs are
usually in focus on JavaOne.
Which ones are considered more "sexy" or attractive to people is of course
up to the Spec Lead. Especially if the idea of a larger Java EE related
focus track was picked up again, looking at inter-JSR topics like CDI
integration is more likely to happen there or (not with actual code) maybe
at some JEE BOF.
Werner
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:13 AM, <users-request_at_jms-spec.java.net> wrote:
> Table of contents:
>
> 1. [jms-spec users] JavaOne - Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
> 2. [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne - Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> 3. [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne - "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>
> 4. [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery - Nigel Deakin <
> nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> 5. [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery - Nigel Deakin <
> nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> 6. [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne - Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:58:21 +0200
> Subject: [jms-spec users] JavaOne
> Nigel/all,
>
> Who is coming to JavaOne?
> Enough to schedule a F2F in the EG room or have you done that already?
>
> Also how about showing some of the EE 8/CDI and other interacttion during
> Hackergarten in addition to the BOFs or conference sessions?
>
> Cheers,
> Werner
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:48:38 +0100
> Subject: [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne
> On 13/10/2015 09:58, Werner Keil wrote:
>
>> Nigel/all,
>>
>> Who is coming to JavaOne?
>> Enough to schedule a F2F in the EG room or have you done that already?
>>
>
> Not yet, but I'll book a slot.
>
> I'm expecting the JMS BOF (Monday 2100) to be a general discussion as well
> (as it's late I expect numbers to be modest).
>
> Also how about showing some of the EE 8/CDI and other interacttion during
>> Hackergarten in addition to the BOFs or
>> conference sessions?
>>
>
> The Hackerharten is for "Participants to contribute to opensource
> projects". I think the F2F is the place to look at my prototype RI, if
> anyone wants to discuss it.
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:53:41 -0400
> Subject: [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne
>
> OpenMQ isn't the RI this time?
>
> C'mon Nigel get into the open source pool with us, the water's fine. :-).
> Bring OpenMQ to hackergarten and show people messaging isn't scary.
> On Oct 13, 2015 7:49 AM, "Nigel Deakin" <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 13/10/2015 09:58, Werner Keil wrote:
>>
>>> Nigel/all,
>>>
>>> Who is coming to JavaOne?
>>> Enough to schedule a F2F in the EG room or have you done that already?
>>>
>>
>> Not yet, but I'll book a slot.
>>
>> I'm expecting the JMS BOF (Monday 2100) to be a general discussion as
>> well (as it's late I expect numbers to be modest).
>>
>> Also how about showing some of the EE 8/CDI and other interacttion during
>>> Hackergarten in addition to the BOFs or
>>> conference sessions?
>>>
>>
>> The Hackerharten is for "Participants to contribute to opensource
>> projects". I think the F2F is the place to look at my prototype RI, if
>> anyone wants to discuss it.
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:56:54 +0100
> Subject: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery
> On 12/10/2015 16:24, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
>> explaining what I meant on my previous email....
>>
>> Someone asked the message grouping to be handled like the follwowing:
>>
>
> That was Tom Barnes (my colleague here at Oracle).
>
>
>> Imaging the Resource Adapter implementation:
>>
>>
>> Tx.begin(); << pseudo-language:
>> for (int i = 0 ; i < 1000; i++) {
>> MDB.callbackmethod(consumer.receive(TIMEOUT));
>> }
>> TX.commit();
>>
>>
>>
>> And I don't think we should do that.. that could be easily a specific
>> AS implementation without requiring any changes to the Spec.
>>
>>
> And indeed WebLogic has such a feature right now. The question is whether
> it should become a standard feature (in addition to batch delivery),
> configured using a standard MDB configuration option.
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:57:01 +0100
> Subject: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-36: Batch delivery
> On 12/10/2015 16:21, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
>> I'm happy with that proposal...
>>
>> It keeps it simple.... just a simple @Batch annotation would be what
>> we require... The timeout would be always in milliseconds?
>>
>
> Java SE 8 does allow more generalised ways of expressing time intervals,
> which we could use if we wanted to. But all other time differences in JMS
> (message expiration, delivery delay) are in milliseconds, and I thought it
> was best to be consistent.
>
> Nigel
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
> To: users_at_jms-spec.java.net
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:03:02 +0100
> Subject: [jms-spec users] Re: JavaOne
> On 13/10/2015 12:53, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> OpenMQ isn't the RI this time?
>>
>
> Fear not, it's still Open MQ / GlassFish.
>
> C'mon Nigel get into the open source pool with us, the water's fine. :-).
>> Bring OpenMQ to hackergarten and show people
>> messaging isn't scary.
>>
>
> I'm not convinced that showing people the internals of a resource adapter
> is not scary...
>
> Nigel
>
>
>> On Oct 13, 2015 7:49 AM, "Nigel Deakin" <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com <mailto:
>> nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 13/10/2015 09:58, Werner Keil wrote:
>>
>> Nigel/all,
>>
>> Who is coming to JavaOne?
>> Enough to schedule a F2F in the EG room or have you done that
>> already?
>>
>>
>> Not yet, but I'll book a slot.
>>
>> I'm expecting the JMS BOF (Monday 2100) to be a general discussion as
>> well (as it's late I expect numbers to be modest).
>>
>> Also how about showing some of the EE 8/CDI and other
>> interacttion during Hackergarten in addition to the BOFs or
>> conference sessions?
>>
>>
>> The Hackerharten is for "Participants to contribute to opensource
>> projects". I think the F2F is the place to look at
>> my prototype RI, if anyone wants to discuss it.
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
> End of digest for list users_at_jms-spec.java.net - Wed, 14 Oct 2015
>
>