I wonder if Oracle would be willing to relinquish control of the spec to
another group? And have someone from there act as spec lead if no one from
Oracle is available due to budgetting issues (as implied by Linda's
comments during the JavaOne talk)
John
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:25 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> I haven't seen anyone beyond Oracle saying JMS is not important to the
>
> cloud (I'm not including Nigel on this).
>
>
>
> So, I think everyone is in agreement that JMS is important, even for the
> cloud.
>
>
>
> Having said that, maybe it's too late to do anything for JavaEE 8 as
>
> it's due to be released too soon for us to do anything, but maybe we
>
> should move forward into proposing things that will be important on
>
> such environments and future EE releases.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Lenny Primak <lprimak_at_hope.nyc.ny.us>
> wrote:
>
> > I think JMS spec is very, very important, even in today's microservice
> environment.
>
> > It is stable, easy (and getting easier) to use and should be basis for
> any new eventing proposals.
>
> > It needs to be moved forward.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Clebert Suconic
>
>