+1 new proposal.
Regards,
Vaquar khan
On 9 Sep 2015 01:43, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you think? is this better, or would you prefer the original
> proposal?
>
> +1. I think it's safer to not allow it as you're proposing. It would be
> complicated to allow both and could cause confusion for users and JMS
> implementors.
>