Agree, +1 for new proposal
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:27 AM vaquar khan <vaquar.khan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 new proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Vaquar khan
> On 9 Sep 2015 01:43, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > What do you think? is this better, or would you prefer the original
>> proposal?
>>
>> +1. I think it's safer to not allow it as you're proposing. It would be
>> complicated to allow both and could cause confusion for users and JMS
>> implementors.
>>
>