(Starting a new thread for this issue, and sent to correct list this time)
Rüdiger,
On 29/03/2012 12:01, Rüdiger zu Dohna wrote:
> On 2012-03-29, at 12:27, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>>>
>> You offer two alternatives.
>>
>> 1. Binding to CDI events.
>>
>> In this, you are defining a listener on a CDI event. How is this related to JMS? Are you suggesting that when a JMS
>> message is received the JMS provider automatically fires a CDI event containing the message payload?
>> If not, what are you suggesting?
>
> Yes, exactly. The same would work for the sender as well,
> and the only thing the business code _has_ to care about,
> is one annotation on the event type.
> Everything else has useful defaults.
So how would the incoming JMS message be converted into a CDI event? Are you proposing a standard mechanism for doing this?
>> 2. Binding to a business interface
>>
>> Is this essentially the MessageAPI approach (which you kindly explained to me when we met in Belgium)?
>
> Exactly! Only that I've explained it from the receiver side this time.
OK. Initially I'd like to find out whether these are two separate proposals, or whether the first is actually a way to
express MessageAPI in terms of CDI events.
Nigel