users@jms-spec.java.net: by thread

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 15 05:35:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 19 05:44:32 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:47:22 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 21 07:31:11 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Mar 21 08:25:40 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 21 09:08:22 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 22 01:14:10 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 22 03:06:49 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 04:56:43 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 29 05:57:14 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 30 08:31:17 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 07:40:57 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Aug 2 07:47:15 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Reza Rahman (Thu Aug 2 09:04:21 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Aug 8 09:48:03 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Mon Sep 3 09:08:30 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nicholas Wright (Fri Sep 7 04:49:07 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API John D. Ament (Wed Apr 4 06:46:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 07:05:22 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Reza Rahman (Tue Dec 13 17:46:29 2011)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 13 12:02:24 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Rob Davies (Tue Mar 13 13:28:14 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Reza Rahman (Thu Mar 15 11:35:41 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches John D. Ament (Thu Mar 15 18:53:27 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 16 05:46:39 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches John Harby (Fri Mar 16 11:36:16 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:45:00 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Reza Rahman (Mon Mar 19 17:47:03 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 20 02:50:54 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Thu Apr 19 08:04:48 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Thu Apr 19 08:18:04 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Fri Apr 20 07:38:00 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Nigel Deakin (Thu Sep 19 09:30:50 2013)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-36) Allow messages to be delivered asynchronously in batches Clebert Suconic (Thu Sep 19 09:34:32 2013)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-67) Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 9 07:53:47 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 15 05:49:16 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 23 03:11:11 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 8 23:54:32 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review John D. Ament (Mon Mar 5 17:48:25 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Pete Muir (Tue Mar 6 08:38:47 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 7 07:25:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Pete Muir (Wed Mar 7 08:37:38 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:47:26 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 20 06:03:57 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Mar 20 06:30:30 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Reza Rahman (Tue Mar 20 07:20:46 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Mar 20 07:34:47 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 20 08:05:04 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 20 07:45:23 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Mar 20 08:25:51 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 20 09:35:24 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Mar 21 08:48:01 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft ready for final review Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 17 10:13:30 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 12 04:11:09 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 12 08:10:01 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Early Draft is posted Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 16 09:02:24 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 2 07:18:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding John D. Ament (Fri Mar 2 13:49:10 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:48:13 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-6) Add Reference to SOAP Binding Reza Rahman (Fri Mar 2 14:54:03 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 2 08:44:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Sastry Malladi (Sun Mar 4 23:16:41 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 5 03:17:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Sastry Malladi (Mon Mar 5 21:40:59 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:48:08 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 28 07:58:04 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Sastry Malladi (Fri Mar 30 10:47:14 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 04:15:43 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding Sastry Malladi (Wed Apr 4 16:57:44 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding John Harby (Wed Apr 4 21:33:25 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding John D. Ament (Wed Apr 4 04:18:19 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-7) Provide HTTP Binding John D. Ament (Mon Mar 5 16:36:08 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-9) Support for AMQP messaging Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 5 08:32:48 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Revised schedule for JSR 343 Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 6 03:49:40 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 12 11:13:53 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 16 07:36:08 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Mar 21 09:04:07 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 21 11:14:28 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Sat Mar 24 03:04:37 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage John D. Ament (Sat Mar 24 07:45:16 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 26 00:34:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 03:27:58 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 29 04:01:45 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Mar 21 11:20:10 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 22 08:50:59 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 22 09:37:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 22 11:20:01 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Rüdiger zu Dohna (Fri Mar 23 00:43:56 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Why are Destinations resources and not Strings? Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 06:28:31 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-46) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 03:01:37 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 03:05:07 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container John D. Ament (Tue Mar 27 03:45:45 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-89) Define standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory in Java SE applications and by a Java EE container Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 03:59:27 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 07:30:45 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way John D. Ament (Tue Mar 27 07:34:08 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Tue Mar 27 10:25:57 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Mar 27 10:45:10 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 30 07:09:05 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Tue Apr 10 07:53:29 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way John D. Ament (Tue Apr 10 08:27:44 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Apr 10 22:51:50 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 11 07:25:33 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Fri Apr 20 06:16:16 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way John D. Ament (Fri Apr 20 06:46:35 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Fri Apr 20 08:21:39 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Sat Apr 21 15:18:54 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Mon Apr 23 03:25:20 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way John D. Ament (Mon Apr 23 03:29:57 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Mon Apr 23 09:47:46 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Apr 24 02:50:52 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Tue Apr 24 09:12:18 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Apr 25 00:48:01 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 25 04:20:05 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Apr 26 02:22:36 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Thu Apr 26 08:27:54 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Reza Rahman (Fri Apr 20 17:48:20 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Mon Apr 23 03:04:01 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Reza Rahman (Mon Apr 23 16:42:16 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Nigel Deakin (Tue May 1 04:20:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-90) Provide simpler mechanism to refer to queues and topics in a portable way Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Mar 27 11:30:08 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 28 07:13:46 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage John D. Ament (Wed Mar 28 08:48:12 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage John Harby (Wed Mar 28 09:24:32 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 03:21:21 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 29 03:57:28 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Poison Message Handling Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 29 04:28:50 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Poison Message Handling Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 05:50:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage John D. Ament (Thu Mar 29 03:58:39 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 04:19:58 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Thu Apr 5 16:53:17 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 06:42:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Tue May 1 07:24:19 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nick Wright (Fri Jul 6 09:14:55 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage Nigel Deakin (Mon Jul 9 09:57:00 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 06:29:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces John D. Ament (Thu Mar 29 06:40:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces Rüdiger zu Dohna (Fri Mar 30 02:35:02 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec issues] (JMS_SPEC-88) Bind JMS to CDI events and/or business interfaces Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 30 03:36:21 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Thu Mar 29 15:57:56 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API John Harby (Thu Mar 29 17:05:42 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-93) Does changing the noLocal flag when connecting to a durable subscription cause the durable subscription to be deleted? Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 30 04:03:24 2012)