On 18/03/2013 09:11, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
> On 12.03.2013 13:27, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>> Community member "genomeprjct" logged this JIRA issue. This is a
>> proposal that JMS takes advantages of the JCA and EJB changes described
>> in the recent email by Bill Shannon that I forwarded recently.
>
> Sorry for being a PITA but I'll raise the some point as in the associated EJB discussion. How can a change like this
> make it in at this time while adding generics to existing methods [1] or supporting Exception#getCause() [2] have to
> wait for another four to five years because it's "too late"?
>
> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-108
> [2] http://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-113
>
I think there has been a misunderstanding. We're not adding this to JMS 2.0. I said in my email at
http://java.net/projects/jms-spec/lists/jsr343-experts/archive/2013-03/message/9 (and in a comment on JMS_SPEC-116) that
these EJB/JCA changes unfortunately have come much too late for us to be able to take advantages of them in JMS 2.0.
Nigel