On 08/12/2011 14:51, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>
> As you know we've had quite a few discussions on this already, and as promised I've written up a proposal. This is
> described in a pdf document at:
> http://java.net/downloads/jms-spec/Simplified%20API/JMS20SimplifiedAPIv1.pdf
> with a corresponding set of javadocs at:
> java.net/projects/jms-spec/downloads/download/Simplified%20API/jms-2.0-javadoc.jar
I've also ran a diff tool on the javadocs to help people see what I've changed compared with JMS 1.1. This generates a
set of annotated javadocs which I've zipped up here:
http://java.net/projects/jms-spec/downloads/download/Simplified%20API/diffs.zip
The changes I have made are fairly localised to a small number of classes, which I've listed in the pdf document, so it
shouldn't be necessary to look at this.
Should I generate a similar report for future changes to the javadocs (when we will be making lots of small changes all
over the API)? Please let me know whether you think you would find it useful.
Nigel