Is this an EE scenario or an SE scenario?
I think the behavior differs in the two environments.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> My same question also applies to everything else... such as
> setExceptionListener, getMetaData(), etc...
>
>
> Should the state be shared with multiple JMSContexts or each context
> should be totally independent?
>
> We have talked about this before, but I don't see any wording on how this
> sharing of the state should be done.
>
> since this is using the building pattern I would expect a
> jmsContext.createContext() would be sharing the same data.... again.. I
> just want to check if that's everybody's interpretation...
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Clebert
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> say you created a JMSContext, and used setClientID....
>>
>>
>> JMSContext ctx = ...
>> ctx.setClientID("someID");
>>
>>
>> Say, if later we call:
>>
>> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
>>
>>
>>
>> What would be the expected value of ctx2.getClientID() ?
>>
>>
>> I'm assuming there will be some connection reused by the JMSContext and
>> ctx.createJMSContext() would reuse the internal connection as we talked
>> earlier. I'm just double checking if this is everybody's expectations...?
>>
>>
>>
>> Clebert
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>