Leonard and everyone,
(Sorry for the long delay in replying, Leonard)
As I mentioned in December, I can't spend time leading JMS 2.1 at this moment because I have been assigned to do some
other work (an urgent WebLogic JMS thing). This is certainly frustrating: we were just beginning to make really good
progress on JMS 2.1, particularly on MDB improvements, and I am very conscious that this is also frustrating and
annoying for those who were collaborating with me on this (particularly those who had started attending the conference
calls).
I'm hoping that we can restart work on JMS 2.1 soon, but I can't give a date just yet. I'll let you know just as soon as
I know more.
The schedule for JMS 2.1 (or Java EE 8) hasn't changed, though clearly the current hiatus will make that a challenge. My
intention is that when things restart we'll review priorities to keep it to a reasonable schedule. MDB improvements will
remain the top feature.
Please keep in mind that any plans, schedules or intentions stated by me or any other Oracle employee are always subject
to the standard Oracle disclaimer here:
https://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/SafeHarborStatement (anyone who has
attended Oracle presentations anywhere will be familiar with this statement).
I'll give another update just as soon as I know more.
Nigel
On 05/01/2016 05:52, Anghel Leonard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm involved in a project that will try to use Java EE 8 and I was curious to ask if JMS 2.1 will continue on
> schedule and be part of Java EE 8 ?
>
> Thanks,
> Leonard
> On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 7:50 AM, Ryan Cuprak <rcuprak_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Nigel,
> This is very unfortunate as I have been drumming up interest in this spec both at CT JUG and also at work. You have been
> doing an excellent job on the spec and running the meetings.
> What type of delay are we looking at?
>
> Regards,
> Ryan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com <mailto:nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Apologies for not being clear. Unfortunately I can't spend much time on JMS 2.1 at the moment due to pressure of
> other work. That means we have to suspend our JMS 2.1 meetings. As I mentioned, I'll let everyone know when the
> situation changes.
> >
> > Nigel
> >
> >> On 09/12/2015 18:26, Ryan Cuprak wrote:
> >> If your not available to host how would it work? Can we still meet via a google hangout?
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com <mailto:nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Chris (and everyone),
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately I can't host the next several JMS 2.1 meetings due to pressure of other work. I'll let everyone know
> when the situation changes.
> >>>
> >>> Nigel
> >>>
> >>>> On 09/12/2015 05:38, Chris Barrow wrote:
> >>>> Hi Nigel,
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a meeting this Thurs (Dec 10th)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Chris
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:16 AM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com <mailto:nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 20/11/2015 12:35, Nigel Deakin wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Next meeting
> >>>>>> ------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Next week is the US Thanksgiving holiday, so our next meeting is in TWO weeks, on Thursday 3rd Dec at 0900 PST.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our meeting on Thurs 3rd Dec is cancelled.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nigel
>