Hi,
(writing to the users, hoping the experts see this).
Pete and I essentially agreed that the JMS "features" he was proposing
originally in CDI 1.1 belong more in the JMS spec to cover CDI integration,
not for CDI to impose requirements on other technologies out of its control.
:-)
John
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Adam Bien <abien_at_adam-bien.com> wrote:
> Hi Experts!,
>
> Fyi: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-106
>
> regards!,
>
> adam
>
>