Just read your JIRA. I think we should do it.
@Nigel: how things will happen from now on... we had already delivered
JMS2... how future changes will be done? new versions? JMS 2.1? how it
works?
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Chris Barrow <chris.barrow_at_kaazing.com>wrote:
> BTW, I did actually file a request for this a while back:
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JMS_SPEC-95
>
> Chris
>
> On 9/18/2013 7:02 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> That's what most providers already do anyways... HornetQ, SunMQ.. etc.. as
> I provided with links before. We just don't have a standardized property to
> the extra ACK mode
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>wrote:
>
>> Clebert,
>>
>> So are you suggesting that there would be a new ack mode
>> "individual-ack", which modifies the behaviour of Message.acknowledge() so
>> that it acknowledges the individual message only? (This would require a
>> non-transacted session, of course.)
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>> On 17/09/2013 22:40, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it would.. we would add a new ACK MODE...
>> INDIVIDUAL_ACKNOWLEDGE
>>
>> if the new ack mode is used, then you would have a new behaviour
>> defined by the new mode. I don't see any problems with that.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:52 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I think when we spoke about it, it would cause current API
>>> breakage/behavioral changes.
>>>
>>> Maybe if we add a new method that did the individual ACK we could avoid
>>> it?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Clebert Suconic
>>> <clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Something for next version... (maintenance version or something)
>>> >
>>> > I feel like I had already talked about this long time ago... sorry if
>>> did..
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have googled at a few Messaging implementations and I have seen lot
>>> of
>>> > them supporting individual acks as an extension:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19909-01/817-3728/program.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQSession.html#INDIVIDUAL_ACKNOWLEDGE
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://docs.jboss.org/hornetq/2.3.0.beta1/docs/user-manual/html/pre-acknowledge.html#individual-ack
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://docs.tibco.com/pub/enterprise_message_service/6.3.0-february-2012/doc/html/tib_ems_api_reference/api/dotNET/html/M_TIBCO_EMS_Message_Acknowledge.htm
>>> >
>>> > WebSphereMQ seems also to have something but I would need to research
>>> more.
>>> > It's enough to say that it seems it has something there.
>>> >
>>> > So, Why not make it standard?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The behaviour would be.. message.acknowledge would only ack the message
>>> > acked and not previous message as it is on the CLIENT_ACK method.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > WDYT?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>
>
>
--
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com