John,
As I mentioned some time ago, I would be happy to have you join the JSR 343 Expert Group, but the JCP people need to
confirm that the correct JSPA agreement is in place. I see you've submitted an application to join the EG, but it
hasn't been approved by the JCP PMO. Do you know what the problem was?
Nigel
On 07/06/2011 01:33, John D. Ament wrote:
> Greetings (and I hope that this is going to all of the experts as well :-) )
>
> First and foremost, since it came up recently, this message, nor the ideas represented with in it, are my own sole
> thoughts and opinions and are in no way the thoughts or opinions of my employer.
>
> It looks like one of the ideas floating around is to simplify message listening. For those unaware, I work on an open
> source project called Seam JMS, which aims to simplify the JMS programming model while leveraging the JSR-299
> development paradigm. One of the ideas we've been tinkering with is how to process JMS messages as CDI events,
> essentially creating simpler message "handlers" yet still supporting all of the transaction, isolation capabilities that
> come with MDBs. As has been noted, this isn't really an EE supported behavior. In addition, we support the opposite
> effect, fired CDI events can be sent via JMS. It's completely typesafe, The events can be either JMS message types or
> POJOs or any type of object. We dynamically convert types back and forth at runtime by scanning supported calls at
> deployment time.
>
> I'm not sure if it would be of any interest to understand some of the inner workings of the frameworks, but based on
> what I've seen on here it may be a good match architecturally for what you're looking for.
>
> - John