Nigel,
On 07/21/2011 04:38 PM, Nigel Deakin wrote:
> I've received no objections so far to either:
> (1) defining some more JMS-specific mandatory activation config properties and
> (2) a new @JMSMessageDriven annotation with such properties available as attributes.
Does anybody know of any (more than experimental) adapter to
@MessageDriven other than JMS? I'd argue that this is an unnecessary
abstraction, considering that JMS itself is already meant to abstract
from all messaging systems!
Rüdiger