Nigel,
Thanks for the update. If Errata are formally voted or at least reviewed by
the EC, then I'll have to review it again before providing my input, but
will do so before (and should there be any further questions let you know
before that)
Maven Central has many variations of "javax.jms" but I can tell from the
date it must be "2.0.1".
It may be a bit early but if you see value in a Spec Lead report to the JCP
EC beside meeting at least several member companies also in the EG (as
Individual Member I am naturally there myself;-) there will be another EC
F2F in London right before DevoXX UK in the week from June 15.
DevoXX UK also still has a CFP (I recall you were at DevoXX BE last year)
and related to it LJC plans an Adopt-a-JSR Summit London, too. LJC was
among Supporters of this JSR, so they might appreciate a proposal of JSR
368 either for DevoXX UK or the Adopt event.
Regards,
Werner
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> On 22/12/2014 12:20, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>
>> The text of each proposed change for the JMS 2.0 errata has now all been
>> formally recorded in JIRA and (except for some
>> trivial typos) circulated to this email list.
>>
>> I've updated the list of issues on JMS 2.0 errata wiki page:
>> https://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/JMS20RevA#Proposed_content with
>> links to the text of each proposed change.
>>
>>
> I have now published draft javadocs at
> https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0RevA-SNAPSHOT/apidocs/index.html
>
> I have also published a draft specification, with all changes shown in
> red, at
> https://jms-spec.java.net/2.0RevA-SNAPSHOT/JMS20a-draft-showchanges.pdf
>
> I am now preparing the paperwork to submit the proposed changes to the JCP
> in accordance with the maintenance process at
> https://jcp.org/en/procedures/jcp2#5
>
> I'll keep you updated with progress. Remember the next stage after that is
> a "public review" followed by a ballot of the JCP executive committee.
>
> Nigel
>
>