users@jms-spec.java.net

by messages with attachments

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects Reza Rahman (Sun Jun 3 16:44:38 2012)
1. JdbcAccountDao.java (2147 bytes)
2. AccountJdbcResourceFactory.java (1073 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) Nigel Deakin (Fri Jun 29 10:59:23 2012)
1. MDBAndRAConfiguration.pdf (147139 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Jul 17 01:06:41 2012)
1. smime.p7s (3773 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73) Nigel Deakin (Tue Jul 24 08:18:23 2012)
1. 133-144.pdf (186104 bytes)
2. JMS20Ch12.pdf (13974 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Is anyone interested in writing about JMS 2.0? Nigel Deakin (Thu Nov 29 11:34:27 2012)
1. Oracle_Press_Proposal_Template_2.doc (35840 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances Nigel Deakin (Tue Dec 4 11:25:05 2012)
1. JMS20_Ch12.pdf (24514 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Jan 17 12:01:29 2013)
1. smime.p7s (3773 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Jan 24 13:11:51 2013)
1. smime.p7s (3773 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Jan 24 13:12:00 2013)
1. smime.p7s (3773 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 25 10:17:22 2013)
1. Chapter1-changes.pdf (376552 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 is now released! Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu May 23 04:40:47 2013)
1. smime.p7s (3773 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Matthew White (Tue Dec 16 07:40:26 2014)
1. part (638 bytes)
2. part (518 bytes)
3. part (418 bytes)
4. part (1208 bytes)
5. part (1266 bytes)
6. part (1851 bytes)
7. part (470 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White (Wed Dec 17 08:18:52 2014)
1. part (418 bytes)
2. part (518 bytes)
3. part (638 bytes)
4. part (470 bytes)
5. part (1851 bytes)
6. part (1266 bytes)
7. part (1208 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Matthew White (Wed Dec 17 08:34:17 2014)
1. part (418 bytes)
2. part (638 bytes)
3. part (518 bytes)
4. part (1851 bytes)
5. part (470 bytes)
6. part (1208 bytes)
7. part (1266 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) Matthew White (Fri Dec 19 05:32:17 2014)
1. part (470 bytes)
2. part (1851 bytes)
3. part (1266 bytes)
4. part (1208 bytes)
5. part (418 bytes)
6. part (518 bytes)
7. part (638 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White (Fri Dec 19 08:22:47 2014)
1. part (518 bytes)
2. part (638 bytes)
3. part (418 bytes)
4. part (1266 bytes)
5. part (1208 bytes)
6. part (470 bytes)
7. part (1851 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White (Tue Dec 23 06:21:51 2014)
1. part (470 bytes)
2. part (1851 bytes)
3. part (1266 bytes)
4. part (1208 bytes)
5. part (418 bytes)
6. part (518 bytes)
7. part (638 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil (Tue Dec 23 06:34:49 2014)
1. part (518 bytes)
2. part (1266 bytes)
3. part (470 bytes)
4. part (418 bytes)
5. part (638 bytes)
6. part (1851 bytes)
7. part (1208 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments vaquar khan (Wed Dec 24 10:36:25 2014)
1. part (1208 bytes)
2. part (1266 bytes)
3. part (1851 bytes)
4. part (638 bytes)
5. part (518 bytes)
6. part (470 bytes)
7. part (418 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White (Mon Jan 5 04:47:26 2015)
1. part (1208 bytes)
2. part (1266 bytes)
3. part (1851 bytes)
4. part (470 bytes)
5. part (638 bytes)
6. part (518 bytes)
7. part (418 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White (Mon Jan 12 06:12:37 2015)
1. part (518 bytes)
2. part (638 bytes)
3. part (418 bytes)
4. part (1266 bytes)
5. part (1208 bytes)
6. part (470 bytes)
7. part (1851 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Matthew White (Mon Jan 12 08:34:01 2015)
1. part (1208 bytes)
2. part (1266 bytes)
3. part (1851 bytes)
4. part (470 bytes)
5. part (638 bytes)
6. part (518 bytes)
7. part (418 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Matthew White (Wed Jan 14 06:09:36 2015)
1. part (1266 bytes)
2. part (1208 bytes)
3. part (470 bytes)
4. part (1851 bytes)
5. part (518 bytes)
6. part (638 bytes)
7. part (418 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White (Mon Jan 19 03:50:01 2015)
1. part (638 bytes)
2. part (518 bytes)
3. part (418 bytes)
4. part (1208 bytes)
5. part (1266 bytes)
6. part (1851 bytes)
7. part (470 bytes)
[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil (Mon Jan 19 04:12:43 2015)
1. part (638 bytes)
2. part (1208 bytes)
3. part (1851 bytes)
4. part (1266 bytes)
5. part (418 bytes)
6. part (518 bytes)
7. part (470 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? David Blevins (Thu Apr 28 15:38:07 2016)
1. image.png (25578 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? Ivar Grimstad (Thu Apr 28 20:23:38 2016)
1. image.png (25578 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? Clebert Suconic (Thu Apr 28 20:38:14 2016)
1. image.png (25578 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? Ivar Grimstad (Thu Apr 28 20:41:41 2016)
1. image.png (25578 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? Matthew White (Fri May 6 07:06:08 2016)
1. Image.ii_1545f057b6085313.png (25578 bytes)
[jms-spec users] Re: Future of JMS Spec with Java.net closing? Ivar Grimstad (Fri May 6 07:21:28 2016)
1. Image.ii_1545f057b6085313.png (25578 bytes)
2. Image.ii_1545f057b6085313.png (25578 bytes)

Last message date: Thu May 11 19:39:00 2017
Archived on: Thu Aug 10 15:15:03 2017 PDT

1198 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]