users@jms-spec.java.net

[jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments

From: Matthew White <WHITEMAT_at_uk.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:47:26 +0000

Hello; Sorry that was a very badly worded question!
I was thinking about the jms2 version of the jms.jar - for us to be able
to us it it needs to come via a Partner agreement site.

More than happy with the approach taken for the updates.

Regards,

Matthew B. White
Architect: IBM MQ JMS, Connectivity & Integration

Phone: 44-1962-817653
E-mail: WHITEMAT_at_uk.ibm.com
About.me: about.me/matthewbwhite
Find me on: and within IBM on:


Hursley Park
Hursley , SO212JN
United Kingdom
"The wrong answers are the ones you go looking for when the right answers
stare you in the face."





From: Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>
To: jsr368-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net
Date: 02/01/2015 10:36
Subject: [jms-spec users] [jsr368-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata:
final request for comments



Matthew,

On 23/12/2014 14:21, Matthew White wrote:
> Happy with the updates.
>
> When might the JMS2.0 errata version be available for the partners?

Are you asking for a draft of the updated spec?

The reason I haven't published one so far is that the JCP process for a
maintenance review
(https://jcp.org/en/procedures/jcp2#5) appears to require me to submit
each change separately (as "diffs") rather than
as a single updated spec document containing all the changes together.

That's why I have recorded each set of changes separately in the
corresponding JIRA issue, and provided links to
everything from the table at
https://java.net/projects/jms-spec/pages/JMS20RevA#Proposed_content . It's
the information
in that table that I will be submitting.

I also thought this might be easier for people to review.

Only after the Executive Committee has approved the changes am I required
to update the specification itself.

I'm obviously going to have to update the spec and javadocs eventually, so
I could circulate a draft, but I'm slightly
worried that, as our discussions continue, the draft might get out of step
with the list of diffs that I actually to submit.

Nigel








Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU




picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 01-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 02-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 03-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 04-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 05-part)

picture
(image/jpeg attachment: 06-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 07-part)