Maybe I have out of date javadocs then, or the javadocs aren't matching the
spec...
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> nope....
>
>
> say you set ctx.setClientID("ID1);
>
>
> on ctx you can create a new context:
>
> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
> Now you do:
>
> ctx2.setClientID("ID2);
>
>
> What would be the outcome of:
>
> System.out.println(ctx.getClientID());
> System.out.println(ctx2.getClientiD());
>
>
>
> since ctx.createJMSContext() is using the building pattern, some people
> would expect it to share a same inner connection, and have
> ctx.getClientID()==ctx2.getClientID()
>
>
>
> I wanted to clear the interpretation for the state on these two objects.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:37 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm confused by this call:
>>
>> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
>>
>> Did you mean something else?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> SE for now...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this an EE scenario or an SE scenario?
>>>> I think the behavior differs in the two environments.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My same question also applies to everything else... such as
>>>>> setExceptionListener, getMetaData(), etc...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should the state be shared with multiple JMSContexts or each context
>>>>> should be totally independent?
>>>>>
>>>>> We have talked about this before, but I don't see any wording on how
>>>>> this sharing of the state should be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> since this is using the building pattern I would expect a
>>>>> jmsContext.createContext() would be sharing the same data.... again.. I
>>>>> just want to check if that's everybody's interpretation...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Clebert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>>> clebert.suconic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> say you created a JMSContext, and used setClientID....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JMSContext ctx = ...
>>>>>> ctx.setClientID("someID");
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Say, if later we call:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JMSContext ctx2 = ctx.createJMSContext();
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would be the expected value of ctx2.getClientID() ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm assuming there will be some connection reused by the JMSContext
>>>>>> and ctx.createJMSContext() would reuse the internal connection as we talked
>>>>>> earlier. I'm just double checking if this is everybody's expectations...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clebert
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>