jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net: by date

Friday, 1 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Spec's reference of EJB's @Asynchronous is incorrect Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] JAX-RS 2.0 PFD Schedule Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: JSR 236 Update Markus KARG
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Spec's reference of EJB's @Asynchronous is incorrect Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] application/json-home Jan Algermissen
Saturday, 2 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] application/json-home Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] application/json-home Jan Algermissen
Sunday, 3 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: JSR 236 Update Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: JSR 236 Update Markus KARG
Monday, 4 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] application/json-home Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Remove unused ParamConverter.toString() ? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Remove unused ParamConverter.toString() ? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] JAX_RS_SPEC-21 Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Marek Potociar
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: resume(Throwable) question Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] move accept header to a client method Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: move accept header to a client method Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Client security configuration proposal for JAX-RS 2.0 Bill Burke
Thursday, 7 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: move accept header to a client method Marek Potociar
Friday, 8 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Headers in ReaderInterceptor - read-only or not? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Headers in ReaderInterceptor - read-only or not? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Default path template and case sensitivity Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Default path template and case sensitivity Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] AsyncResponse unmapped exception and CompletionCallback Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Preparing for PFD Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Preparing for PFD Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] client exception processing not what we agreed... Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Headers in ReaderInterceptor - read-only or not? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: AsyncResponse unmapped exception and CompletionCallback Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: AsyncResponse unmapped exception and CompletionCallback Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: AsyncResponse unmapped exception and CompletionCallback Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: client exception processing not what we agreed... Bill Burke
Monday, 11 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: client exception processing not what we agreed... Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] I'd like to remove _at_Uri Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: I'd like to remove _at_Uri Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] is get(Class<T>) really a convenience? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: I'd like to remove _at_Uri Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Bill Burke
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] is get(Class<T>) really a convenience? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Priority annotation build issue Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] Uri annotation and absolute uri template Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Uri annotation and absolute uri template Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Uri annotation and absolute uri template Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Priority annotation build issue Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Should we remove _at_Suspend/Async? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Should we remove _at_Suspend/Async? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Should we remove _at_Suspend/Async? Jan Algermissen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Should we remove _at_Suspend/Async? Bill Burke
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Should we remove _at_Suspend/Async? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Should we remove @Suspend/Async? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Should we remove @Suspend/Async? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] always close Response after InvocationCallback? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Priority annotation build issue Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Unify WebTarget and UriBuilder exceptions? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Priority annotation build issue Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Link not possible to build ? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Link not possible to build ? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Link not possible to build ? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Link not possible to build ? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Link not possible to build ? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Unify WebTarget and UriBuilder exceptions? Sergey Beryozkin
Thursday, 14 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Link toString method Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Priority annotation build issue Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Link toString method Julian Reschke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Priority annotation build issue Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Link toString method Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Link toString method Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Link toString method Julian Reschke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Link toString method Julian Reschke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Bill Burke
Friday, 15 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: I'd like to remove @Uri Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
Monday, 18 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: I'd like to remove _at_Uri Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] remove abortWith()? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we need new UriInfo Methods? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: remove abortWith()? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: remove abortWith()? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: remove abortWith()? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: remove abortWith()? Marek Potociar
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] contract parameter for register() methods Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] More allowable component types for DynamicFeature? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Not a big fan of _at_NameBinding, remove it? Bill Burke
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: Not a big fan of _at_NameBinding, remove it? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] contract parameter for register() methods Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] More allowable component types for DynamicFeature? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] contract parameter for register() methods Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] More allowable component types for DynamicFeature? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] UriTemplate API? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: More allowable component types for DynamicFeature? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Not a big fan of @NameBinding, remove it? Sergey Beryozkin
Thursday, 21 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: can you _at_Context inject Configurable or Configuration? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] can't log console message on thrown exceptions Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] can't log console message on thrown exceptions Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] LinkBuilder buildRelativized Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: LinkBuilder buildRelativized Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
Friday, 22 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] can't log console message on thrown exceptions Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
Monday, 25 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] ContainerRequestContext setRequestURI Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] LinkBuilder buildRelativized Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: UriTemplate API? Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: UriTemplate API? Bill Burke
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: UriTemplate API? Sergey Beryozkin
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: LinkBuilder buildRelativized Marek Potociar
- [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: LinkBuilder buildRelativized Santiago Pericas-Geertsen

Last message date: Tue Feb 12 09:04:41 2013
Archived on: Thu Aug 10 15:12:00 2017 PDT