[jsr339-experts] Re: I'd like to remove _at_Uri

From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:17:33 +0000

On 11/02/13 13:28, Bill Burke wrote:
> Injection of WebTargets require the configuration of an underlying
> Client. Client configuration will often require SSL configuration
> (truststore). Even without SSL, there's connection TTL, connection
> pooling configuration, and other things.
> I'm not a big fan of having functionality that requires vendor-specific
> configuration in order to work. This is why I think we should remove
> support for @Uri. I'm pretty sure it would be possible to write a CDI
> extension if users wanted to do this, but I think this is beyond the
> scope of the JAX-RS spec.
I would not have problems with delaying the introduction of @Uri

Cheers, Sergey