On 13/02/13 18:02, Marek Potociar wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin_at_talend.com> wrote:
>
>> On 13/02/13 17:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> May be I'm missing something but now that Link.Builder has to be
>>> implemented by the implementations, and we only have Link() and Link.map
>>> is not accessible, it means it is not possible to build Link ?
>>>
>> should we have
>>
>> Link(URI)
>> Link(URI, Map<String, String>)
>>
>> constructors instead of Link() ?
>
> There is no constructor other than default one. You can choose to provide any constructor you want in your impl.
Sorry, I missed it was an abstract class now, sorry for the noise
Thanks, Sergey
>
> Marek
>
>>
>> Thanks, Sergey
>