[jsr339-experts] Re: I'd like to remove _at_Uri

From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:10:28 +0100

FYI - after considering pros and cons I have decided to remove the @Uri from the API for now.


On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Bill Burke <bburke_at_redhat.com> wrote:

> Injection of WebTargets require the configuration of an underlying Client. Client configuration will often require SSL configuration (truststore). Even without SSL, there's connection TTL, connection pooling configuration, and other things.
> I'm not a big fan of having functionality that requires vendor-specific configuration in order to work. This is why I think we should remove support for @Uri. I'm pretty sure it would be possible to write a CDI extension if users wanted to do this, but I think this is beyond the scope of the JAX-RS spec.
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com