Done. Looks good. Thanks. :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen
> [mailto:Santiago.PericasGeertsen_at_oracle.com]
> Sent: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2013 16:58
> To: jsr339-experts_at_jax-rs-spec.java.net
> Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: JSR 236
> Update
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Markus KARG <markus_at_headcrashing.eu> wrote:
>
> >>> Indeed this looks primising and removes some of the caveats I
> >>> mentioned with threads in EJBs. So will the JSR 339 spec get
> >>> overhauled by replacing "normal" executors by managed ones?
> >>> Particularly the examples showing how to use executors should be
> >>> changed so people will understand that they should use managed ones
> >> in non-SE environments.
> >>
> >> We could at least include a reference to this spec. Note that the
> >> current spec does not show any code related to the creation of
> >> executors, it assumes they were created elsewhere. In any case, I
> will
> >> update that section to mention 236.
> >>
> >> -- Santiago
> >
> > Actually page 47 of the public draft showed a code example which
> utilizes
> > Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor. As you remember, I complained that
> this
> > is invalid in an EJB scenario. So the new managed executor could be
> used
> > here instead.
>
> That has been updated a few weeks back (based on your feedback, among
> others), please check the latest version of the spec.
>
> -- Santiago