[jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home

From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:07:28 +0000

Jan - I keep suffering from not reading the messages carefully - you are
referring to the acceptance within your own project, which I guess is a
good indication of the usefulness of this media type - sorry;

I'm with Marek though and I saw you had agreed to his proposal; I'd also
suggest to do the same for WADL media type - whatever people say we are
seeing WADL being useful to users, I'm sure the same is the case in RI...


On 03/02/13 17:57, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> On 02/02/13 06:46, Jan Algermissen wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>> Mark Nottingham is working on a draft that I consider a key ingredient
>> to RESTful work. Given it is done by Mark and given the experience and
>> great developer acceptance I am experiencing in my current project,
>> I'd say the media type is here to stay.
>> I suggest we put it into the spec as a constant in 2.0
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-json-home-02
>> I think he should rename it to maybe application/home+json because I
>> actually see use cases for the +xxx suffixes.
>> Should you like to put it in, I'd go ahead and ask him about the change.
> Interesting of course, but I'm not sure what are you talking about when
> referring to a "great developer acceptance" - I'm of course not the one
> to judge on it but it is the first time I'm hearing about it, thanks for
> the link though :-), I'll definitely keep an eye
> Cheers, Sergey
>> Jan