jsr368-experts@jms-spec.java.net: by date

Tuesday, 25 November 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) Nigel Deakin
Monday, 1 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-162 (Typos in section 7.3 "Asynchronous send") Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-163 (Javadoc for JMSContext#setClientID contains obsolete MessageContext reference) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-160 (JMS API source contains self-closing HTML tags) Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-157 (JMS 2.0 introduced an incompatible restriction on creating two sessions per connection in Java EE) Nigel Deakin
Thursday, 4 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 9 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-161 (serialVersionUID of JMSException has changed from JMS 1.1 to JMS 2.0 ) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 16 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Nigel Deakin
Wednesday, 17 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-155 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to createSession(bool,int)) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: Summary of proposed changes Nigel Deakin
Thursday, 18 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-157 (JMS 2.0 introduced an incompatible restriction on creating two sessions per connection in Java EE) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Nigel Deakin
Friday, 19 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) Nigel Deakin
Monday, 22 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-133: Update javadoc comments for QueueConnection#createQueueSession and TopicConnection#createTopicSession Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 23 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil
Wednesday, 24 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments vaquar khan
Friday, 26 December 2014
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) Chris Barrow
Friday, 2 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata: MS_SPEC-164 (Typos in section 7.3.5 and 12.2: Change Session to MessageProducer) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil
Monday, 5 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 6 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-158 (JMS 2.0 introduced incompatible changes to Connection.stop and close and Session.close) Nigel Deakin
Thursday, 8 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-165: Error in javadoc for Connection#stop and JMSContext#stop Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-165: Error in javadoc for Connection#stop and JMSContext#stop Chris Barrow
Monday, 12 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: JMS 2.0 errata: JMS_SPEC-125 (Define whether a JMS provider should call reset after sending a BytesMessage asynchronously) Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-166: Define that the JMS provider should call reset on a StreamMessage passed to a CompletionListener Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Nigel Deakin
Wednesday, 14 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Matthew White
Thursday, 15 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: createContext on Queue and Topic Connection Factories Nigel Deakin
Friday, 16 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil
Monday, 19 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Matthew White
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 errata: final request for comments Werner Keil
Tuesday, 27 January 2015
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata now available for formal review Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 errata now available for formal review Nigel Deakin
Thursday, 12 February 2015
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-167: Session javadoc should mention consumer.close is allowed outside thread of control Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 Errata: JMS_SPEC-167: Session javadoc should mention consumer.close is allowed outside thread of control Nigel Deakin
Monday, 16 March 2015
- [jsr368-experts] JMS 2.0 errata is now released Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 17 March 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Clebert
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Clebert Suconic
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Clebert Suconic
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-89: Standard API to create and configure a ConnectionFactory Nigel Deakin
Thursday, 23 July 2015
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: Take advantage of EJB 3.2's RA improvement for MDBs Nigel Deakin
Wednesday, 30 September 2015
- [jsr368-experts] JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: Clebert Suconic
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JMS_SPEC-116: JMS MDB improvements: Clebert Suconic
Monday, 29 February 2016
- [jsr368-experts] svn -> git (GitHub) Ivar Grimstad
- [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] svn -> git (GitHub) Chris Barrow
- [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) David Blevins
- [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) Ivar Grimstad
Tuesday, 1 March 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: svn -> git (GitHub) Werner Keil
Friday, 18 March 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Advice: mirror on GitHub Ivar Grimstad
- [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub Nigel Deakin
- [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub Werner Keil
- [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub Ivar Grimstad
Monday, 21 March 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 22 March 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: Advice: mirror on GitHub Werner Keil
Saturday, 16 April 2016
- [jsr368-experts] JavaOne 2016 Ivar Grimstad
Sunday, 17 April 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: JavaOne 2016 Werner Keil
Monday, 22 August 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] update to Java EE 8 plan Ivar Grimstad
Thursday, 25 August 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Fwd: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] update to Java EE 8 plan Nigel Deakin
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
- [jsr368-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] The future of JMS 2.1 and Java EE 8 Nigel Deakin

Last message date: Tue Nov 29 01:28:26 2016
Archived on: Thu Aug 10 15:14:56 2017 PDT