users@jms-spec.java.net: by thread

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 17 01:42:30 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rob Davies (Tue Jan 17 03:14:05 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Jan 17 12:44:23 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Reza Rahman (Tue Jan 17 15:27:59 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 18 03:48:59 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API (CDI questions) Nigel Deakin (Thu Jan 19 10:34:01 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 3 06:33:16 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 15 05:35:26 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Mon Mar 19 05:44:32 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Mar 19 10:47:22 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 21 07:31:11 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Wed Mar 21 08:25:40 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Mar 21 09:08:22 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 22 01:14:10 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 22 03:06:49 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Mar 29 04:56:43 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Rüdiger zu Dohna (Thu Mar 29 05:57:14 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 30 08:31:17 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 07:40:57 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Thu Aug 2 07:47:15 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Reza Rahman (Thu Aug 2 09:04:21 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Aug 8 09:48:03 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Mon Sep 3 09:08:30 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nicholas Wright (Fri Sep 7 04:49:07 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API John D. Ament (Wed Apr 4 06:46:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Nigel Deakin (Wed Apr 4 07:05:22 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-64) Define simplified JMS API Reza Rahman (Tue Dec 13 17:46:29 2011)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE Rüdiger zu Dohna (Tue Jan 17 12:49:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 18 02:16:50 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-39) Make clientId optional when creating a durable subscription Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 18 04:36:22 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 6 06:36:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 09:35:37 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Tue May 15 07:27:44 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Wed May 23 04:50:01 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Wed May 30 07:28:22 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] Re: [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Chris Barrow (Wed May 30 09:45:00 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Wed May 30 10:30:34 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Clebert Suconic (Wed May 30 10:38:33 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Thu May 31 03:00:54 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Clebert Suconic (Thu May 31 06:46:14 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Wed Jun 13 09:56:29 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Tue Sep 11 04:13:21 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nicholas Wright (Tue Sep 11 04:41:11 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber Nigel Deakin (Thu Sep 13 08:34:21 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-51) Change Session.createDurableSubscriber() to return a MessageConsumer Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 3 07:34:58 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-50) Clarify that JMS providers must implement both P2P and Pub-Sub Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 3 08:44:54 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-49) Improve specification of ExceptionListener Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 3 10:17:45 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] JSR 343: Transition to JCP 2.8 Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 4 02:32:58 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Specify that connection.stop() or close() may not be called from a MessageListener Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 4 07:58:32 2012)
[jms-spec users] Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Hiram Chirino (Wed Jan 4 09:19:57 2012)
- [jms-spec users] Re: Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 03:36:49 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] Re: Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Hiram Chirino (Mon Jan 9 17:57:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-67) Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 10 04:48:40 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-67) Relaxing the requirement to throw an exception if a message is sent to a deleted temp destination Nigel Deakin (Fri Mar 9 07:53:47 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] QueueBrowser.getEnumeration John D. Ament (Fri Jan 6 02:49:48 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 04:06:42 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration John D. Ament (Mon Jan 9 05:40:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 06:01:44 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Jan 9 08:32:06 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 10:39:47 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration John D. Ament (Mon Jan 9 10:45:10 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Jan 9 12:26:00 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration John D. Ament (Mon Jan 9 14:31:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 10 04:37:13 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 10 04:41:28 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration Reza Rahman (Tue Jan 10 06:57:35 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-38) Allow JMS clients to specify whether a message is compressed in transit Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 6 04:57:03 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 6 06:30:13 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible John D. Ament (Fri Jan 6 16:59:03 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 02:22:29 2012)
    - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Jan 9 04:20:31 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-35) Remove the use of unchecked exceptions from the JMS API as far as possible reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Mon Jan 9 07:08:42 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Sastry Malladi! Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 9 10:42:39 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Welcome Sastry Malladi! Sastry Malladi (Mon Jan 9 12:16:18 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: Re: QueueBrowser.getEnumeration reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Mon Jan 9 11:02:13 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-65) Clarify use of NoLocal arg when using createDurableSubscriber reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Mon Jan 9 11:03:57 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Nick Wright Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 10 07:22:55 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Matthew White Nigel Deakin (Wed Jan 11 03:04:34 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession Nigel Deakin (Thu Jan 12 07:43:36 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 13 08:11:38 2012)
  - [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-45) Clarify and improve Connection.createSession Nigel Deakin (Tue Jan 24 11:46:17 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored Rüdiger zu Dohna (Fri Jan 13 01:08:32 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored Clebert Suconic (Fri Jan 13 05:58:54 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 13 06:39:42 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Fwd: Fwd: Re: TCK test that the transacted and acknowledge mode parameters are ignored Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 13 07:13:15 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 16 07:44:19 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() Rüdiger zu Dohna (Mon Jan 16 07:48:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() Rob Davies (Mon Jan 16 07:53:08 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-68) Add new method Session.acknowledge() reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Tue Jan 17 09:49:07 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Thu Jan 19 08:01:33 2012)
- [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE Nigel Deakin (Thu Jan 19 11:01:48 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-63) Introduce concept of platform default JMS connection factory in Java EE reza_rahman_at_lycos.com (Thu Jan 19 13:10:04 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Andrew Kennedy Nigel Deakin (Fri Jan 20 04:50:35 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-27) Clarify the relationship between the JMS and other Java EE specifications Nigel Deakin (Thu Jan 26 11:01:43 2012)
[jms-spec users] Buchi Reddy Busireddy (Thu Jan 26 23:04:36 2012)
[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-69) Clarify that QueueRequestor and TopicRequestor only work in a non-transacted session with auto or dups-ok ack Nigel Deakin (Mon Jan 30 04:14:51 2012)