users@jax-rs-spec.java.net: by author

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Thu Oct 18 01:55:49 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Thu Oct 11 14:58:17 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Gzipping Interceptors (Mon Oct 29 04:16:50 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] A proposal to make the JAX-RS API "lambda ready". (Mon Oct 29 04:06:42 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Gzipping Interceptors (Mon Oct 29 03:55:45 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: security is a big hole in client API (Mon Oct 29 03:53:11 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: (Another) proposal on Configuration API changes. (Mon Oct 29 03:50:03 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: (Another) proposal on Configuration API changes. (Mon Oct 29 03:41:38 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] FYI: AsyncResponse.cancel/resume API updated. (Mon Oct 29 03:33:28 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Integration of Java EE security annotations with JAX-RS 2.0 (Sat Oct 27 12:30:28 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: New abstract methods in Response (Sat Oct 27 09:55:31 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] (Another) proposal on Configuration API changes. (Sat Oct 27 09:17:01 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Client Authorization (Sat Oct 27 09:10:59 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Integration of Java EE security annotations with JAX-RS 2.0 (Sat Oct 27 09:09:46 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Using JSR107 "JCache" with JAX-RS 2.0 (Sat Oct 27 09:05:39 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Gzipping Interceptors (Sat Oct 27 07:41:49 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: New abstract methods in Response (Sat Oct 27 07:36:03 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Thu Oct 11 14:03:58 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: HEADS-UP: ParamConverter API issues. (Thu Oct 11 13:58:08 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: ExceptionMappers and WebApplicationExceptions (Thu Oct 25 14:16:09 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: ExceptionMappers and WebApplicationExceptions (Thu Oct 25 14:10:29 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: New abstract methods in Response (Thu Oct 25 13:56:46 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: setting request properties disrupts fluent api (Thu Oct 25 13:44:32 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Thu Oct 11 13:54:32 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: setting request properties disrupts fluent api (Thu Oct 25 07:02:23 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: New abstract methods in Response (Thu Oct 25 06:43:13 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: setting request properties disrupts fluent api (Thu Oct 25 06:41:54 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] New abstract methods in Response (Thu Oct 25 05:59:23 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: setting request properties disrupts fluent api (Thu Oct 25 02:15:27 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Interceptor Invocation and CDI (Thu Oct 25 02:13:41 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Wed Oct 24 02:26:58 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Interceptor Invocation and CDI (Wed Oct 24 02:16:49 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: There could be more than one Link header for a given rel (Tue Oct 23 11:59:52 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Tue Oct 23 11:52:46 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: There could be more than one Link header for a given rel (Tue Oct 23 07:52:01 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Tue Oct 23 07:49:34 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] HEADS-UP: ParamConverter API issues. (Wed Oct 10 09:01:50 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Mon Oct 22 09:42:30 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Mon Oct 22 09:37:10 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Mon Oct 22 08:44:35 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Mon Oct 22 08:37:56 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Mon Oct 22 08:20:40 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Bring back BeanValidation (Mon Oct 22 07:47:56 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Is ResumeCallback needed (Mon Oct 22 05:56:15 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: More confusion about UriBuilder.build and UriBuilder.resolveTemplate (Mon Oct 22 05:44:47 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: UriBuilder.segment and build with encodePathSlash (Mon Oct 22 05:43:36 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: UriBuilder and RFC6570 (Mon Oct 22 05:40:06 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Is ResumeCallback needed (Mon Oct 22 05:35:57 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: ReaderInterceptor example question (Mon Oct 22 05:32:38 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Mon Oct 22 05:29:36 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: ReaderInterceptor example question (Mon Oct 22 03:45:43 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Is ResumeCallback needed (Mon Oct 22 03:42:11 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Transactions, EJBs and AsyncResponse (Mon Oct 22 03:39:08 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Mon Oct 22 03:37:51 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: There could be more than one Link header for a given rel (Mon Oct 22 02:48:57 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Transactions, EJBs and AsyncResponse (Mon Oct 22 02:46:12 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Mon Oct 22 02:44:34 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Bring back BeanValidation (Mon Oct 22 02:20:09 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Mon Oct 22 02:09:51 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Bring back BeanValidation (Mon Oct 22 02:07:10 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: AsyncResponse should be able to accept responses immediately (Wed Oct 3 16:21:36 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Async API Usage Guidance (Wed Oct 3 16:17:54 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Is ResumeCallback needed (Wed Oct 3 16:13:48 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Fri Oct 19 08:57:30 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Fri Oct 19 08:54:51 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Bring back BeanValidation (Fri Oct 19 08:50:54 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Fri Oct 19 08:39:07 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: AsyncResponse should be able to accept responses immediately (Wed Oct 3 16:09:33 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Bring back BeanValidation (Fri Oct 19 03:41:58 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Heads Up: Severe problem when rewriting responses! Is our Filter API suitable? (Fri Oct 19 03:27:02 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Fri Oct 19 03:18:05 2012)

[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: Re: Re: Please review: Feature, Configurable API update proposal. (Fri Oct 19 03:14:42 2012)