quality@glassfish.java.net
Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Adam Bien <
abien_at_adam-bien.com
>
Date
: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:33:49 +0200
Hi All,
GF v3 is intended to be Java EE 6 RI. But it comes with JRuby, but not
with EJB 3.1 per default. Isn't it strange?
regards,
adam
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Judy Tang: "Re: Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging"
Previous message
:
Jose Noheda: "Error while deploying WAR using admin console"
Next in thread
:
Judy Tang: "Re: Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging"
Reply
:
Judy Tang: "Re: Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging"
Reply
:
Jerome Dochez: "Re: Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]