quality@glassfish.java.net

Re: Thinking about GF v3 Default Packaging

From: Judy Tang <Judy.J.Tang_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:01:26 -0700

Hi Adam,

Good topic. Hope others can share your view :-)

It is good for GF v3 to provide different Packaging. Which one should
be default, may be most used one ?

Thanks,
Judy

Adam Bien wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> GF v3 is intended to be Java EE 6 RI. But it comes with JRuby, but not
> with EJB 3.1 per default. Isn't it strange?
>
> regards,
>
> adam
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>