Hi Judy,
Judy Tang schrieb:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Good topic. Hope others can share your view :-)
>
> It is good for GF v3 to provide different Packaging. Which one should
> be default, may be most used one ?
This would be really interesting. Most of the GF v2 projects I know, are
using the EJB container. Otherwise they would go rather with Tomcat or
Jetty...
One solution would be to provide different, pre-bundled profiles from
e.g. portal. Then GF would be even leaer, because JRuby guys would get
only the JRuby support etc.
regards,
adam
>
> Thanks,
> Judy
>
> Adam Bien wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> GF v3 is intended to be Java EE 6 RI. But it comes with JRuby, but
>> not with EJB 3.1 per default. Isn't it strange?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> adam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>
--
Consultant, Author, Java Champion
Homepage: www.adam-bien.com
Weblog: blog.adam-bien.com
eMail: abien_at_adam-bien.com
Mobile: 0049(0)170 280 3144
Books: Enterprise Architekturen (ISBN: 393504299X),
Java EE 5 Architekturen (ISBN: 3939084247),
J2EE Patterns, J2EE Hotspots, Enterprise Frameworks and Struts