Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>> Easy enough to do that ... I was thinking the names would be
>> <portname value>+"Endpoint"? Kind of ugly but shouldn't need typed
>> that often. Any better suggestions?
>
> It would be good to align that with the port variables we inject, so
> people can easily infer names.
Hi Kohsuke, were you agreeing with me? I think we both meant the same
(or similar) thing. Here's an example. Please correct me if you meant
something else. I was thinking port and endpoint names would be:
fooPort and fooPortEndpoint
thanks,
Ken