Ken Hofsass wrote:
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
>>> Easy enough to do that ... I was thinking the names would be
>>> <portname value>+"Endpoint"? Kind of ugly but shouldn't need typed
>>> that often. Any better suggestions?
>>
>> It would be good to align that with the port variables we inject, so
>> people can easily infer names.
>
> Hi Kohsuke, were you agreeing with me?
Yes. I just suggested that you use the same convention we use today to
inject port variables. Such code exists today, and I thought it's
actually using a bit more complicated logic than portName+"EndPoint".
So I wanted to make sure that we use the same code, not similar but
slightly different convention.
> I think we both meant the same
> (or similar) thing. Here's an example. Please correct me if you meant
> something else. I was thinking port and endpoint names would be:
> fooPort and fooPortEndpoint
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com