Hi,
> In domain.xml, an admin can define which address to bind the http-
> listener to (defaults to "0.0.0.0" iirc). There's no address
> currently in the DTD (though adding that is easy enough). In
> network-listener, there is the "host" attribute which stands a
> pretty chance of being what I want. Is that intended to be the
> physical address? If so, I think we should rename it or at the
> least update the comments.
Hmm. Socket API uses both names in the same way. I'm ok to change this
to address.
> There also appears to be no grizzly counterpart suitable for
> converting access-log entries over to grizzly. That's assuming, of
> course, we want to do the logging in grizzly and not keep it in
> glassfish, but I think it makes sense for grizzly to deal with it
> especially with port unification looming...
Think we planned to keep access-log with WebContainer related config,
not Grizzly.
Thanks.
WBR,
Alexey.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>