> This is avery bad answer :(
>
> The way I read that is "its a bug.. its a major bug. but we've
> abandoned GF2 so we wont fix it."
BTW, I just backported the fix to the trunk of GlassFish v2.1-next.
See
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
for relevant commit info, including the revision numbers of the
affected files.
The fix will be available in the upcoming nightly build of
Glassfish v2.1-next.
As mentioned earlier by Alexis, as a paying customer you could
escalate this and other bugs, and ask for their fixes to become
available in supported patch releases for GlassFish v2.1, which ship
on a regular basis.
Thanks,
Jan
> That may be comfortable for the development team but asking us to
> move our entier service to GF3 is not necessarily a tenable thing to
> do.
>
> Hoenslty, Im getting less and less enchanted with Glassfish. This
> sort of "hell with the past" development is fine for hobbyists but
> totally inappropriate for mission critical development.
>
> If we PAID sun for service contract, could we get a version of GF2
> that actually *works* ???
>
> [Message sent by forum member 'jeffpk' (jeffpk)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=336482
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net