2.1 is not the end of the 2.x story.
At a minimum, paying customers can escalade bugs and obtain a patch
(in this case a backport of v3 on v2.1).
Individual patches are aggregated into patch release that ship on a
regular basis for v2.1.
-Alexis
On Mar 11, 2009, at 21:25, glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> This is avery bad answer :(
>
> The way I read that is "its a bug.. its a major bug. but we've
> abandoned GF2 so we wont fix it."
>
> That may be comfortable for the development team but asking us to
> move our entier service to GF3 is not necessarily a tenable thing to
> do.
>
> Hoenslty, Im getting less and less enchanted with Glassfish. This
> sort of "hell with the past" development is fine for hobbyists but
> totally inappropriate for mission critical development.
>
> If we PAID sun for service contract, could we get a version of GF2
> that actually *works* ???
> [Message sent by forum member 'jeffpk' (jeffpk)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=336482
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>