quality@glassfish.java.net

Re: [Issue 5980] [web_container] Jars in WEB-INF/lib not visible for the JSP compiler...

From: Adam Bien <abien_at_adam-bien.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:51:36 +0200

Hi All,

I just downloaded the Liferay / GF v2 bundle and migrated the
installation step by step to to b24. I described the steps earlier.
It failed with the reported error. I deployed liferay to TP 2 - and it
worked. In case GF v3 b24 / 25 works in your case - even better -
probably I overlooked something.

I just wanted to make sure, that Liferay works properly with GF, because
I know it is gaining momentum (at least in Germany). I use it with GF
v2u2 - it works well as well,

I do not need Liferay on GF v3 - I just tried it for Fishcat. So in case
it works in your case, close the case. I will retry the installation
later (no time right now), and document the results,

thanks,

adam




Jerome Dochez schrieb:
> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/22/08 11:10, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/22/08 10:49, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>> ok good.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you ought to say that in the bug report update because it
>>>>> did sound like you didn't try. Just mention that it is working
>>>>> fine with our internal tests when you request the test case.
>>>>>
>>>> I said so on my first evaluation.
>>> all right, sorry for the whistle then.
>>>
>> No problem. I've worked on Tomcat long enough to learn to ignore
>> reports from users that are not willing to even narrow down the problem
>> or do a little investigation on their own. I won't go as far as as Remy
>> did most of the time, but...
> I certainly hope so :)
>
> in this particular case, it comes from Adam who has been a very
> consistent and reliable source of bug reports so that's why I would
> like to ensure we just don't "overlook".
>
> thanks, jerome
>>
>> -Kin-man
>>
>>> jerome
>>>>
>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>
>>>>> in any case, I don't think we need the steps, from what Adam says,
>>>>> just get liferay...
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks, jerome
>>>>>
>>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>>> Of course! If thing as basic as this doesn't work, we would have
>>>>>> noticed it long ago. TCK and dev tests have such tests. I've also
>>>>>> manually tested it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The classpath for JSP compilation is computed and passed to
>>>>>> jasper from
>>>>>> either the deployer (pre-compilation) or catalina (compiled on
>>>>>> demand). The user reported problem with the later. I was asking
>>>>>> him to try pre compiling, just to narrow the problem down a
>>>>>> little, but I didn't get that info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/22/08 09:57, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>>> So are you saying that we have a test with a WEB-INF/lib jar
>>>>>>> file accessed from a JSP and it passes ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sherry Shen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you send us the test steps so that we can reproduce the issue?
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sherry
>>>>>>>> Adam Bien wrote, On 9/22/2008 9:31 AM:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Kchung,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you were able to deploy liferay into GF v3 b24/25?
>>>>>>>>> Liferay is a part of WebSynergy, Sun / Liferay commitment...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I cannot send you the whole portal, because it is too big. It
>>>>>>>>> works with TP 2, but not with b24...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> adam
>>>>>>>>> kchung_at_dev.java.net schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> User kchung changed the following:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What |Old value |New value
>>>>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Resolution| |WORKSFORME
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ------- Additional comments from kchung_at_dev.java.net Mon Sep
>>>>>>>>>> 22 16:26:44 +0000 2008 -------
>>>>>>>>>> Since the test case and clarifications are not forthcoming, I
>>>>>>>>>> am closing this as
>>>>>>>>>> WFM. Please reopen with a concrete test.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>