Kin-man Chung wrote:
>
>
> On 09/22/08 11:10, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/22/08 10:49, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>> ok good.
>>>>
>>>> I think you ought to say that in the bug report update because it
>>>> did sound like you didn't try. Just mention that it is working fine
>>>> with our internal tests when you request the test case.
>>>>
>>> I said so on my first evaluation.
>> all right, sorry for the whistle then.
>>
> No problem. I've worked on Tomcat long enough to learn to ignore
> reports from users that are not willing to even narrow down the problem
> or do a little investigation on their own. I won't go as far as as Remy
> did most of the time, but...
I certainly hope so :)
in this particular case, it comes from Adam who has been a very
consistent and reliable source of bug reports so that's why I would like
to ensure we just don't "overlook".
thanks, jerome
>
> -Kin-man
>
>> jerome
>>>
>>> -Kin-man
>>>
>>>> in any case, I don't think we need the steps, from what Adam says,
>>>> just get liferay...
>>>>
>>>> thanks, jerome
>>>>
>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>> Of course! If thing as basic as this doesn't work, we would have
>>>>> noticed it long ago. TCK and dev tests have such tests. I've also
>>>>> manually tested it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The classpath for JSP compilation is computed and passed to jasper
>>>>> from
>>>>> either the deployer (pre-compilation) or catalina (compiled on
>>>>> demand). The user reported problem with the later. I was asking
>>>>> him to try pre compiling, just to narrow the problem down a
>>>>> little, but I didn't get that info.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/22/08 09:57, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>> So are you saying that we have a test with a WEB-INF/lib jar file
>>>>>> accessed from a JSP and it passes ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sherry Shen wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you send us the test steps so that we can reproduce the issue?
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sherry
>>>>>>> Adam Bien wrote, On 9/22/2008 9:31 AM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Kchung,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you were able to deploy liferay into GF v3 b24/25?
>>>>>>>> Liferay is a part of WebSynergy, Sun / Liferay commitment...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I cannot send you the whole portal, because it is too big. It
>>>>>>>> works with TP 2, but not with b24...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> adam
>>>>>>>> kchung_at_dev.java.net schrieb:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> User kchung changed the following:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What |Old value |New value
>>>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Resolution| |WORKSFORME
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------- Additional comments from kchung_at_dev.java.net Mon Sep
>>>>>>>>> 22 16:26:44 +0000 2008 -------
>>>>>>>>> Since the test case and clarifications are not forthcoming, I
>>>>>>>>> am closing this as
>>>>>>>>> WFM. Please reopen with a concrete test.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>