Hi Adam,
What you did is really big help for us. This worked in TP2 but not in
GF v3 b24 / 25, we need to find out why.
We SQE is helping to recreate this issue, some how running into the NPE
at start domain time. Need to look
into this first, then continue to see is we can see the same error as
you did.
Thanks so much for spending the time and effort, appreciate !
Judy
Adam Bien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just downloaded the Liferay / GF v2 bundle and migrated the
> installation step by step to to b24. I described the steps earlier.
> It failed with the reported error. I deployed liferay to TP 2 - and it
> worked. In case GF v3 b24 / 25 works in your case - even better -
> probably I overlooked something.
>
> I just wanted to make sure, that Liferay works properly with GF,
> because I know it is gaining momentum (at least in Germany). I use it
> with GF v2u2 - it works well as well,
>
> I do not need Liferay on GF v3 - I just tried it for Fishcat. So in
> case it works in your case, close the case. I will retry the
> installation later (no time right now), and document the results,
>
> thanks,
>
> adam
>
>
>
>
> Jerome Dochez schrieb:
>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/22/08 11:10, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/22/08 10:49, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>> ok good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you ought to say that in the bug report update because it
>>>>>> did sound like you didn't try. Just mention that it is working
>>>>>> fine with our internal tests when you request the test case.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I said so on my first evaluation.
>>>> all right, sorry for the whistle then.
>>>>
>>> No problem. I've worked on Tomcat long enough to learn to ignore
>>> reports from users that are not willing to even narrow down the problem
>>> or do a little investigation on their own. I won't go as far as as
>>> Remy
>>> did most of the time, but...
>> I certainly hope so :)
>>
>> in this particular case, it comes from Adam who has been a very
>> consistent and reliable source of bug reports so that's why I would
>> like to ensure we just don't "overlook".
>>
>> thanks, jerome
>>>
>>> -Kin-man
>>>
>>>> jerome
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>
>>>>>> in any case, I don't think we need the steps, from what Adam
>>>>>> says, just get liferay...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks, jerome
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>>>> Of course! If thing as basic as this doesn't work, we would have
>>>>>>> noticed it long ago. TCK and dev tests have such tests. I've also
>>>>>>> manually tested it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The classpath for JSP compilation is computed and passed to
>>>>>>> jasper from
>>>>>>> either the deployer (pre-compilation) or catalina (compiled on
>>>>>>> demand). The user reported problem with the later. I was asking
>>>>>>> him to try pre compiling, just to narrow the problem down a
>>>>>>> little, but I didn't get that info.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/22/08 09:57, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>>>> So are you saying that we have a test with a WEB-INF/lib jar
>>>>>>>> file accessed from a JSP and it passes ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sherry Shen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you send us the test steps so that we can reproduce the
>>>>>>>>> issue?
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sherry
>>>>>>>>> Adam Bien wrote, On 9/22/2008 9:31 AM:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kchung,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you were able to deploy liferay into GF v3 b24/25?
>>>>>>>>>> Liferay is a part of WebSynergy, Sun / Liferay commitment...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I cannot send you the whole portal, because it is too big. It
>>>>>>>>>> works with TP 2, but not with b24...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> adam
>>>>>>>>>> kchung_at_dev.java.net schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> User kchung changed the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What |Old value |New value
>>>>>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Resolution| |WORKSFORME
>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------- Additional comments from kchung_at_dev.java.net Mon Sep
>>>>>>>>>>> 22 16:26:44 +0000 2008 -------
>>>>>>>>>>> Since the test case and clarifications are not forthcoming,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am closing this as
>>>>>>>>>>> WFM. Please reopen with a concrete test.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>> quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>