I tried building latest Liferay trunk with GFv3 prelude b25. The
building process was successful.
But iam getting below error when i start GF. I made sure that ports 8080
and 4848 are free before executing start-domain command.
Note : The Liferay configuration happens during the first start of
glassfish after build is successful
[#|2008-09-23T13:38:46.040+0530|SEVERE|GlassFish10.0|global|_ThreadID=12;_ThreadName=Thread-3;|Unable
to start v3. Closing all ports
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.adapter.AdminConsoleAdapter.init(AdminConsoleAdapter.java:339)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.admin.adapter.AdminConsoleAdapter.postConstruct(AdminConsoleAdapter.java:301)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.inject(AbstractWombImpl.java:150)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.ConstructorWomb.initialize(ConstructorWomb.java:86)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.get(AbstractWombImpl.java:75)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.SingletonInhabitant.get(SingletonInhabitant.java:58)
at com.sun.hk2.component.LazyInhabitant.get(LazyInhabitant.java:107)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractInhabitantImpl.get(AbstractInhabitantImpl.java:60)
at org.jvnet.hk2.component.Habitat$1.get(Habitat.java:252)
at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:345)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.GrizzlyService.registerNetworkProxy(GrizzlyService.java:293)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.GrizzlyService.postConstruct(GrizzlyService.java:208)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.inject(AbstractWombImpl.java:150)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.ConstructorWomb.initialize(ConstructorWomb.java:86)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.get(AbstractWombImpl.java:75)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.SingletonInhabitant.get(SingletonInhabitant.java:58)
at com.sun.hk2.component.LazyInhabitant.get(LazyInhabitant.java:107)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractInhabitantImpl.get(AbstractInhabitantImpl.java:60)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.ApplicationLoaderInjector.postConstruct(ApplicationLoaderInjector.java:52)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.inject(AbstractWombImpl.java:150)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.ConstructorWomb.initialize(ConstructorWomb.java:86)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractWombImpl.get(AbstractWombImpl.java:75)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.SingletonInhabitant.get(SingletonInhabitant.java:58)
at com.sun.hk2.component.LazyInhabitant.get(LazyInhabitant.java:107)
at
com.sun.hk2.component.AbstractInhabitantImpl.get(AbstractInhabitantImpl.java:60)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.AppServerStartup.run(AppServerStartup.java:184)
at
com.sun.enterprise.v3.server.AppServerStartup$1.run(AppServerStartup.java:114)
|#]
[#|2008-09-23T13:38:46.350+0530|WARNING|GlassFish10.0|javax.enterprise.system.tools.admin|_ThreadID=13;_ThreadName=Thread-3;|JNDI
provider for JNDI URLs that look like rmi://host:port/name is not
working. The JMX RMI connector will not be accessible to clients, even
if it appears to load correctly. See issues #6025, 5637|#]
Thanks
Ajit
Judy Tang wrote:
> Thanks Kin-man and Jerome for looking into this issue. We will work
> together on this. We are asking
> help from our SQE WebSynergy team to try to see if the issue can be
> recreated.
>
> Thanks,
> Judy
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/22/08 11:10, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/22/08 10:49, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>> ok good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you ought to say that in the bug report update because it
>>>>>> did sound like you didn't try. Just mention that it is working
>>>>>> fine with our internal tests when you request the test case.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I said so on my first evaluation.
>>>> all right, sorry for the whistle then.
>>>>
>>> No problem. I've worked on Tomcat long enough to learn to ignore
>>> reports from users that are not willing to even narrow down the problem
>>> or do a little investigation on their own. I won't go as far as as
>>> Remy
>>> did most of the time, but...
>> I certainly hope so :)
>>
>> in this particular case, it comes from Adam who has been a very
>> consistent and reliable source of bug reports so that's why I would
>> like to ensure we just don't "overlook".
>>
>> thanks, jerome
>>>
>>> -Kin-man
>>>
>>>> jerome
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>
>>>>>> in any case, I don't think we need the steps, from what Adam
>>>>>> says, just get liferay...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks, jerome
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kin-man Chung wrote:
>>>>>>> Of course! If thing as basic as this doesn't work, we would have
>>>>>>> noticed it long ago. TCK and dev tests have such tests. I've also
>>>>>>> manually tested it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The classpath for JSP compilation is computed and passed to
>>>>>>> jasper from
>>>>>>> either the deployer (pre-compilation) or catalina (compiled on
>>>>>>> demand). The user reported problem with the later. I was asking
>>>>>>> him to try pre compiling, just to narrow the problem down a
>>>>>>> little, but I didn't get that info.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Kin-man
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/22/08 09:57, Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>>>>>> So are you saying that we have a test with a WEB-INF/lib jar
>>>>>>>> file accessed from a JSP and it passes ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sherry Shen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you send us the test steps so that we can reproduce the
>>>>>>>>> issue?
>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sherry
>>>>>>>>> Adam Bien wrote, On 9/22/2008 9:31 AM:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kchung,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you were able to deploy liferay into GF v3 b24/25?
>>>>>>>>>> Liferay is a part of WebSynergy, Sun / Liferay commitment...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I cannot send you the whole portal, because it is too big. It
>>>>>>>>>> works with TP 2, but not with b24...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> adam
>>>>>>>>>> kchung_at_dev.java.net schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> User kchung changed the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What |Old value |New value
>>>>>>>>>>> ================================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Resolution| |WORKSFORME
>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------- Additional comments from kchung_at_dev.java.net Mon Sep
>>>>>>>>>>> 22 16:26:44 +0000 2008 -------
>>>>>>>>>>> Since the test case and clarifications are not forthcoming,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am closing this as
>>>>>>>>>>> WFM. Please reopen with a concrete test.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>> quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>> quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>