Mitesh is on vacation. I emailed Sahoo.
thanks.
Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> Fixing the record. Peter _is_ a committer.
>
> - eduard/o
>
>
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>> Thanks, Tom.
>>
>> I see a few more came in. Here is my tally:
>>
>> rochelle +1
>> Jielin +1
>> tom +1
>> [Peter K +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
>> guy +1
>> chris +1
>> andrei +1
>> gordon +1
>> Markus +1
>> marina +1
>> [Craig R +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
>> Michael +1
>>
>> that is 10 +1, two known 0 (vacation & new to project), 0 -1.
>>
>> I think that Mitesh and Sahoo have not voted, right? They are in
>> india TZ, so I think it would be appropriate to give them a chance to
>> vote overnight.
>>
>> We still need to decide what "-1" means :-), but so far, it seems we
>> can decide that separatedly.
>>
>> - eduard/o
>>
>>
>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>> Of the 14 current committers, I have recieved 9 votes in support,
>>> and 0 votes against. Of the non-voters, 1 is on vacation and 1 is
>>> new to the project and I would not expect to see votes from either
>>> of them.
>>>
>>> I believe that is adequate support to move forward.
>>>
>>> -Tom
>>>
>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
>>>>
>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back
>>>> on everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss,
>>>> separatedly and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community
>>>> should handle arguing the merits of a given candidate, but I am
>>>> fairly confident that we will not have that problem in the case of
>>>> Wonseok and we don't want to impede progress while we figure out
>>>> the process.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>
>>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
>>>>> (strawman) protocol:
>>>>>
>>>>> * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a
>>>>> new committer (the 'candidate')
>>>>> * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate
>>>>> has shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit
>>>>> status
>>>>> * Committers should vote.
>>>>> * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I
>>>>> suspect this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
>>>>>
>>>>> The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so
>>>>> I'll put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by
>>>>> people. Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence
>>>>>> module to Wonseok Kim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular
>>>>>> basis to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to
>>>>>> other particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been
>>>>>> providing indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by
>>>>>> the end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider
>>>>>> non-response to indicate support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Tom Ware
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>