Re: Commit Access for Wonseok Kim
Thanks, Eliot.
Eliot Morrison wrote:
>
> Mitesh is on vacation. I emailed Sahoo.
>
> thanks.
>
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>> Fixing the record. Peter _is_ a committer.
>>
>> - eduard/o
>>
>>
>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>> Thanks, Tom.
>>>
>>> I see a few more came in. Here is my tally:
>>>
>>> rochelle +1
>>> Jielin +1
>>> tom +1
>>> [Peter K +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
>>> guy +1
>>> chris +1
>>> andrei +1
>>> gordon +1
>>> Markus +1
>>> marina +1
>>> [Craig R +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
>>> Michael +1
>>>
>>> that is 10 +1, two known 0 (vacation & new to project), 0 -1.
>>>
>>> I think that Mitesh and Sahoo have not voted, right? They are in
>>> india TZ, so I think it would be appropriate to give them a chance to
>>> vote overnight.
>>>
>>> We still need to decide what "-1" means :-), but so far, it seems we
>>> can decide that separatedly.
>>>
>>> - eduard/o
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>> Of the 14 current committers, I have recieved 9 votes in support,
>>>> and 0 votes against. Of the non-voters, 1 is on vacation and 1 is
>>>> new to the project and I would not expect to see votes from either
>>>> of them.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that is adequate support to move forward.
>>>>
>>>> -Tom
>>>>
>>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back
>>>>> on everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss,
>>>>> separatedly and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community
>>>>> should handle arguing the merits of a given candidate, but I am
>>>>> fairly confident that we will not have that problem in the case of
>>>>> Wonseok and we don't want to impede progress while we figure out
>>>>> the process.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>>
>>>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
>>>>>> (strawman) protocol:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a
>>>>>> new committer (the 'candidate')
>>>>>> * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate
>>>>>> has shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit
>>>>>> status
>>>>>> * Committers should vote.
>>>>>> * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I
>>>>>> suspect this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so
>>>>>> I'll put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by
>>>>>> people. Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence
>>>>>>> module to Wonseok Kim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular
>>>>>>> basis to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to
>>>>>>> other particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been
>>>>>>> providing indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by
>>>>>>> the end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider
>>>>>>> non-response to indicate support.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Tom Ware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>