Fixing the record. Peter _is_ a committer.
- eduard/o
Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> Thanks, Tom.
>
> I see a few more came in. Here is my tally:
>
> rochelle +1
> Jielin +1
> tom +1
> [Peter K +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
> guy +1
> chris +1
> andrei +1
> gordon +1
> Markus +1
> marina +1
> [Craig R +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
> Michael +1
>
> that is 10 +1, two known 0 (vacation & new to project), 0 -1.
>
> I think that Mitesh and Sahoo have not voted, right? They are in india
> TZ, so I think it would be appropriate to give them a chance to vote
> overnight.
>
> We still need to decide what "-1" means :-), but so far, it seems we can
> decide that separatedly.
>
> - eduard/o
>
>
> Tom Ware wrote:
>> Of the 14 current committers, I have recieved 9 votes in support, and
>> 0 votes against. Of the non-voters, 1 is on vacation and 1 is new to
>> the project and I would not expect to see votes from either of them.
>>
>> I believe that is adequate support to move forward.
>>
>> -Tom
>>
>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>
>>> I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
>>>
>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
>>>
>>> Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back on
>>> everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss,
>>> separatedly and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community should
>>> handle arguing the merits of a given candidate, but I am fairly
>>> confident that we will not have that problem in the case of Wonseok
>>> and we don't want to impede progress while we figure out the process.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> - eduard/o
>>>
>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
>>>> (strawman) protocol:
>>>>
>>>> * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a
>>>> new committer (the 'candidate')
>>>> * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate has
>>>> shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit status
>>>> * Committers should vote.
>>>> * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
>>>>
>>>> We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I
>>>> suspect this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
>>>>
>>>> The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so
>>>> I'll put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by
>>>> people. Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
>>>>
>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>
>>>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence module
>>>>> to Wonseok Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular basis
>>>>> to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to other
>>>>> particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been
>>>>> providing indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by
>>>>> the end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider non-response
>>>>> to indicate support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tom Ware
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>