Thanks, Tom.
I see a few more came in. Here is my tally:
rochelle +1
Jielin +1
tom +1
[Peter K +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
guy +1
chris +1
andrei +1
gordon +1
Markus +1
marina +1
[Craig R +1 -- but he is not a committer, right?]
Michael +1
that is 10 +1, two known 0 (vacation & new to project), 0 -1.
I think that Mitesh and Sahoo have not voted, right? They are in india
TZ, so I think it would be appropriate to give them a chance to vote
overnight.
We still need to decide what "-1" means :-), but so far, it seems we can
decide that separatedly.
- eduard/o
Tom Ware wrote:
> Of the 14 current committers, I have recieved 9 votes in support, and 0
> votes against. Of the non-voters, 1 is on vacation and 1 is new to the
> project and I would not expect to see votes from either of them.
>
> I believe that is adequate support to move forward.
>
> -Tom
>
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>
>> I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
>>
>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
>>
>> Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back on
>> everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss,
>> separatedly and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community should
>> handle arguing the merits of a given candidate, but I am fairly
>> confident that we will not have that problem in the case of Wonseok
>> and we don't want to impede progress while we figure out the process.
>>
>> thanks,
>> - eduard/o
>>
>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>
>>
>>> OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
>>> (strawman) protocol:
>>>
>>> * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a
>>> new committer (the 'candidate')
>>> * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate has
>>> shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit status
>>> * Committers should vote.
>>> * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
>>>
>>> We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I
>>> suspect this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
>>>
>>> The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so
>>> I'll put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by
>>> people. Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
>>>
>>> - eduard/o
>>>
>>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence module
>>>> to Wonseok Kim.
>>>>
>>>> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular basis
>>>> to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to other
>>>> particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been providing
>>>> indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>>>>
>>>> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by the
>>>> end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider non-response to
>>>> indicate support.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tom Ware
>>>>
>>>>
>