I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back on
everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss, separatedly
and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community should handle arguing
the merits of a given candidate, but I am fairly confident that we will
not have that problem in the case of Wonseok and we don't want to impede
progress while we figure out the process.
thanks,
- eduard/o
Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
> (strawman) protocol:
>
> * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a new
> committer (the 'candidate')
> * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate has
> shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit status
> * Committers should vote.
> * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
>
> We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I suspect
> this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
>
> The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so I'll
> put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by people.
> Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
>
> - eduard/o
>
> Tom Ware wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence module to
>> Wonseok Kim.
>>
>> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular basis
>> to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to other
>> particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been providing
>> indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>>
>> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by the
>> end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider non-response to
>> indicate support.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom Ware
>>
>