Thanks everyone!
I will make more efforts to contribute good quality of code and make TopLink
Essentials better one as you have done.
Eduardo, how about specifying organizations in the committers list?
I know most of committers but don't know all and would like to know whether
they are Oracle employee or or Sun. Also new members may be curious to know.
Thanks!
-Wonseok
On 11/15/06, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <pelegri_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> I have listed all the committers at the TopLink Essentials page. See:
>
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/index.html#committers
>
> Based on this proposed protocol, Tom is responsible to report back on
> everybody's vote. Votes are not private. We will discuss, separatedly
> and in a public forum, how the GlassFish community should handle arguing
> the merits of a given candidate, but I am fairly confident that we will
> not have that problem in the case of Wonseok and we don't want to impede
> progress while we figure out the process.
>
> thanks,
> - eduard/o
>
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> > OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
> > (strawman) protocol:
> >
> > * An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a new
> > committer (the 'candidate')
> > * All other committers should consider whether the new candidate has
> > shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit status
> > * Committers should vote.
> > * Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
> >
> > We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I suspect
> > this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
> >
> > The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so I'll
> > put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by people.
> > Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
> >
> > - eduard/o
> >
> > Tom Ware wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence module to
> >> Wonseok Kim.
> >>
> >> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular basis
> >> to the project and also been providing valuable feedback to other
> >> particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been providing
> >> indicates to me commit access should be granted.
> >>
> >> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by the
> >> end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider non-response to
> >> indicate support.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tom Ware
> >>
> >
>