OK, since we are doing this for the first time, I propose this
(strawman) protocol:
* An existing committer (the 'advocate' - better name?) proposes a new
committer (the 'candidate')
* All other committers should consider whether the new candidate has
shown technical & team abilities needed to be granted commit status
* Committers should vote.
* Advocate tallies the votes and reports back to the DEV alias.
We will need to figure out how many +1 vs -1, etc, etc. But I suspect
this is not going to be an issue for Wonseok.
The process should be consistent across all GlassFish projects, so I'll
put together a better fleshed strawman and will run it by people.
Sometime after the flurry of this next Monday (tomorrow) :-)
- eduard/o
Tom Ware wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I propose we grant commit access for the entity-persistence module to
> Wonseok Kim.
>
> Wonseok, has been contributing high quality code on a regular basis to
> the project and also been providing valuable feedback to other
> particpants. The quality and quantity of work he has been providing
> indicates to me commit access should be granted.
>
> Please reply either to the persistence list or directly to me by the
> end of day on Monday (November 13) I will consider non-response to
> indicate support.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Ware
>