I don't think NetBeans would let having a visual solution for JSF. Many
people use NetBeans because of it and it seems to have a lot of bug fixes at
NetBeans 6.5. I guess the big mystery is about Woodstock.
I have always preferred Sun's standards and implementations. Hope they don't
screw up.
Meanwhile I'm "dating" Eclipse's WTP + RichFaces.
2008/10/1 jsr <j-nabble_at_ragtop.org>
>
> I'm using the Woodstock team's silence as an excuse to finally get rid of
> both them and VWP.
>
> It has become painfully obvious that Project Woodstock, just like VWP, was
> designed as a proof of concept and not for use with production
> applications.
> This started becoming more evident when they decided to switch everything
> to
> use client side rendering even though performance was hideous. This
> approach
> works fine if you are just doing a small page with a couple of text fields,
> but a large production application is a different story. Their lack of
> communication about the status of the project is just the latest sign that
> they don't intend on their components being seriously used in a production
> environment.
>
> If I were you guys, I would be running away from Woodstock as fast as I
> could. Even if the project miraculously comes back to life, they've already
> shown that at any moment it could die again leaving everyone stuck using an
> unsupported set of components.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/No-news-%3D-bad-news---tp19756018p19761542.html
> Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>